HEMATKUMAR NARAYANDAS RAVAL vs ANILBHAI MOTIBHAI VANAKAR Advocate - A D GADHAVI, B N GADHAVI — 331/2025

Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138,. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY CONVICTION on 24th March 2026.

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJSK140004342025

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

331/2025

Filing Date

23-06-2025

Registration No

331/2025

Registration Date

23-06-2025

Court

TALUKA COURT, VADALI

Judge

1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

24th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--JUDGMENT BY CONVICTION

Acts & Sections

NEGOTIABLE INSTRUMENTS ACT, 1881 Section 138,

Petitioner(s)

HEMATKUMAR NARAYANDAS RAVAL

Adv. S K CHARAN, J D SUTARIYA

Respondent(s)

ANILBHAI MOTIBHAI VANAKAR Advocate - A D GADHAVI, B N GADHAVI

Hearing History

Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C

24-03-2026

Disposed

07-03-2026

JUDGEMENT

23-02-2026

JUDGEMENT

16-02-2026

FINAL ARGUMENTS

12-02-2026

FINAL ARGUMENTS

Final Orders / Judgements

24-03-2026
JUDEGEMENT

Case Summary The Vadali Judicial Magistrate Court convicted Anielbhai Motibhai Vankar under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act for dishonoring a cheque worth ₹4,50,000. The complainant proved that the cheque was issued for a legally enforceable debt and that all statutory requirements under Section 138 (including demand notice and non-payment) were fulfilled; the accused failed to rebut the statutory presumption under Section 139 with credible evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary The Vadali Judicial Magistrate Court convicted Anielbhai Motibhai Vankar under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act for dishonoring a cheque worth ₹4,50,000. The complainant proved that the cheque was issued for a legally enforceable debt and that all statutory requirements under Section 138 (including demand notice and non-payment) were fulfilled; the accused failed to rebut the statutory presumption under Section 139 with credible evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

TALUKA COURT, VADALI All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case