HEMATKUMAR NARAYANDAS RAVAL vs ANILBHAI MOTIBHAI VANAKAR Advocate - A D GADHAVI, B N GADHAVI — 331/2025
Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138,. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY CONVICTION on 24th March 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJSK140004342025
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
331/2025
Filing Date
23-06-2025
Registration No
331/2025
Registration Date
23-06-2025
Court
TALUKA COURT, VADALI
Judge
1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
24th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGMENT BY CONVICTION
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
HEMATKUMAR NARAYANDAS RAVAL
Adv. S K CHARAN, J D SUTARIYA
Respondent(s)
ANILBHAI MOTIBHAI VANAKAR Advocate - A D GADHAVI, B N GADHAVI
Hearing History
Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Disposed
JUDGEMENT
JUDGEMENT
FINAL ARGUMENTS
FINAL ARGUMENTS
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 24-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 07-03-2026 | JUDGEMENT | |
| 23-02-2026 | JUDGEMENT | |
| 16-02-2026 | FINAL ARGUMENTS | |
| 12-02-2026 | FINAL ARGUMENTS |
Final Orders / Judgements
Case Summary The Vadali Judicial Magistrate Court convicted Anielbhai Motibhai Vankar under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act for dishonoring a cheque worth ₹4,50,000. The complainant proved that the cheque was issued for a legally enforceable debt and that all statutory requirements under Section 138 (including demand notice and non-payment) were fulfilled; the accused failed to rebut the statutory presumption under Section 139 with credible evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary The Vadali Judicial Magistrate Court convicted Anielbhai Motibhai Vankar under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act for dishonoring a cheque worth ₹4,50,000. The complainant proved that the cheque was issued for a legally enforceable debt and that all statutory requirements under Section 138 (including demand notice and non-payment) were fulfilled; the accused failed to rebut the statutory presumption under Section 139 with credible evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts