JALABA MORARDAN GADHAVI vs KHODIDAN MORARDAN GADHAVI Advocate - A M PATHAN — 4/2022
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section O20,. Status: JUDGEMENT. Next hearing: 16th April 2026.
RCS - REGULAR CIVIL SUIT
CNR: GJSK140002722022
Next Hearing
16th April 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
4/2022
Filing Date
04-03-2022
Registration No
4/2022
Registration Date
04-03-2022
Court
TALUKA COURT, VADALI
Judge
1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
JALABA MORARDAN GADHAVI
Adv. D N PATEL, N D JAIN
GEETABEN MORARDAN GADHAVI
Adv. D N PATEL,N D JAIN
KAILASDAN MORARDAN GADHAVI
Adv. D N PATEL,N D JAIN
VANRAJDAN MORARDAN GADHAVI
Adv. D N PATEL,N D JAIN
Respondent(s)
KHODIDAN MORARDAN GADHAVI Advocate - A M PATHAN
GADHAVI JIVABA MORARDAN(Legal Heir)(Dead) 2.
SOBHABA MORARDAN GADHAVI
Adv. M S BALOSPURA
SHOBHABA MORARDAN GADHAVI
Hearing History
Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
JUDGEMENT
JUDGEMENT
FINAL ARGUMENTS
FINAL ARGUMENTS
FINAL ARGUMENTS
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 04-04-2026 | JUDGEMENT | |
| 24-03-2026 | JUDGEMENT | |
| 07-03-2026 | FINAL ARGUMENTS | |
| 18-02-2026 | FINAL ARGUMENTS | |
| 20-01-2026 | FINAL ARGUMENTS |
Interim Orders
Case Summary The court partially allowed the plaintiffs' appeal petition. The court held that the plaintiffs have a prima facie case as it is their first appearance in the suit, and granted them relief regarding the maintenance injunction against defendant No. 1 from making illegal constructions on the jointly-owned agricultural property. However, the court rejected the plaintiffs' claims for mandatory relief and dismissed their request for an interim order. The final decision on the property partition and distribution of shares will be determined after the regular suit concludes. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Case Summary The court partially allowed the plaintiffs' appeal petition. The court held that the plaintiffs have a prima facie case as it is their first appearance in the suit, and granted them relief regarding the maintenance injunction against defendant No. 1 from making illegal constructions on the jointly-owned agricultural property. However, the court rejected the plaintiffs' claims for mandatory relief and dismissed their request for an interim order. The final decision on the property partition and distribution of shares will be determined after the regular suit concludes. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts