THE STATE OF GUJARAT vs RAJUBHAI MOTIBHAI PATEL — 214/2026

Case under Gujarat (bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 85-1,66-1-B. Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJSK140002512026

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

214/2026

Filing Date

11-02-2026

Registration No

214/2026

Registration Date

11-02-2026

Court

TALUKA COURT, VADALI

Judge

1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

14th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY

FIR Details

FIR Number

11209054240260

Police Station

VADALI POLICE STATION - SABARKANTHA DISTRICT

Year

2024

Acts & Sections

GUJARAT (BOMBAY) PROHIBITION ACT, 1949 Section 85-1,66-1-B

Petitioner(s)

THE STATE OF GUJARAT

Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

RAJUBHAI MOTIBHAI PATEL

Hearing History

Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C

14-03-2026

Disposed

13-03-2026

ORDER

07-03-2026

PROCESS TO ACCUSED

11-02-2026

PROCESS TO ACCUSED

Final Orders / Judgements

14-03-2026
ORDER

Summary The Vadodara Special Magistrate Court convicted the accused under Gujarat Prohibition Act Section 65(1) for possessing liquor without a permit. Considering the accused's first-time offense, poor socio-economic background, family responsibilities, and promise of reform, the court imposed lenient punishment of ₹100 fine (or one day simple imprisonment in default) instead of the minimum sentence, citing special and adequate reasons warranting discretionary leniency. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Vadodara Special Magistrate Court convicted the accused under Gujarat Prohibition Act Section 65(1) for possessing liquor without a permit. Considering the accused's first-time offense, poor socio-economic background, family responsibilities, and promise of reform, the court imposed lenient punishment of ₹100 fine (or one day simple imprisonment in default) instead of the minimum sentence, citing special and adequate reasons warranting discretionary leniency. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

TALUKA COURT, VADALI All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case