PATEL RATANBEN MANILAL(Legal Heir) vs KHAS JAMIN SAMPADAN ADHIKARISHREE — 20/2026

Case under Land Acquisition Act, 1894 Section 18. Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED on 16th March 2026.

Case disposed

CMA SC - CIVIL MISC. APPLICATION - SR/CIVIL/SMALL CAUSE COU

CNR: GJSK050004122026

Filing Number

20/2026

Filing Date

25-Feb-2026

Registration No

20/2026

Registration Date

25-Feb-2026

Court

TALUKA COURT, KHEDBRAHMA

Judge

3-Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

Decision Date

16-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--ALLOWED

Last updated 12-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Land Acquisition Act, 1894 Section 18

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.PATEL RATANBEN MANILAL(Legal Heir)

    Adv. B M PURIANI1.

  2. 2.PATEL MANILAL BHIMJIBHAI

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.KHAS JAMIN SAMPADAN ADHIKARISHREE

  2. 2.KARYAPALK ENGINEERSHREE

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 16-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    Summary The court allowed the appellant's petition and directed the defendant to pay ₹58,444 to the appellant, who is the legal heir of the deceased original claimant. The court determined that the deceased had a valid claim against the government, and as the direct heir, the appellant is entitled to recover the amount owed to their deceased predecessor. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 16-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  4. 13-Mar-2026

    Reply

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  5. 07-Mar-2026

    Notice To Opponents

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  6. 05-Mar-2026

    Notice To Opponents

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  7. 28-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  8. 25-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 20/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The court allowed the appellant's petition and directed the defendant to pay ₹58,444 to the appellant, who is the legal heir of the deceased original claimant. The court determined that the deceased had a valid claim against the government, and as the direct heir, the appellant is entitled to recover the amount owed to their deceased predecessor. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case