ASODA HARAJI DITAJI(Legal Heir) vs COLLECTOR SAHEB SHREE Advocate - AGP — 7/2022
Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section O21,. Status: PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE. Next hearing: 15th April 2026.
RCS - REGULAR CIVIL SUIT
CNR: GJSK050003142022
Next Hearing
15th April 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
7/2022
Filing Date
28-02-2022
Registration No
7/2022
Registration Date
28-02-2022
Court
TALUKA COURT, KHEDBRAHMA
Judge
3-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE & ADDL. CJM
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
ASODA HARAJI DITAJI(Legal Heir)
Adv. M S BALOSPURA1.
ASHODA BACHUBHAI HARAJIBHAI 1.
ASODA KANTIBHAI HARAJIBHAI(Legal Heir) 1.2.
ASHODA JIVIBEN KANTIBHAI 1.2.
ASHODA SUBHASH KANTIBHAI 1.2.
ASHODA AJAYKUMAR KANTIBHAI 1.2.
ASODA JIVABHAI HARAJIBHAI 1.2.
ASODA KISHANBHAI KANTIBHAI
Respondent(s)
COLLECTOR SAHEB SHREE Advocate - AGP
NAYAB COLLECTOR SAHEB SHREE KACHERI
MAMLATDAR KACHERI VIJAYNAGAR
PRAYOJANA VAHIVATDAR SHREE SANKALIT AADIJATI VIKASH PJOJECT KACHERI
EKLAVY MODEL RESIDENCIAL SCHOOL DHOLAVANI
Hearing History
Judge: 3-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE & ADDL. CJM
PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE
PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE
PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE
PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE
PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 07-03-2026 | PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE | |
| 31-01-2026 | PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE | |
| 03-01-2026 | PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE | |
| 19-12-2025 | PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE | |
| 12-11-2025 | PLAINTIFF EVIDENCE |
Interim Orders
Summary The court dismissed the petition filed by the plaintiffs challenging a prior order regarding agricultural land. The court found that the plaintiffs failed to establish their first-instance case regarding possession and ownership of the disputed land since 1970, and rejected their claims about continuous occupation and cultivation. The court upheld the previous decision granting the land to Defendant No. 5 for establishing an exclusive residential school for tribal children, finding no legal merit in the plaintiffs' arguments against this public purpose allocation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The court dismissed the petition filed by the plaintiffs challenging a prior order regarding agricultural land. The court found that the plaintiffs failed to establish their first-instance case regarding possession and ownership of the disputed land since 1970, and rejected their claims about continuous occupation and cultivation. The court upheld the previous decision granting the land to Defendant No. 5 for establishing an exclusive residential school for tribal children, finding no legal merit in the plaintiffs' arguments against this public purpose allocation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts