GAMAR PINTUBEN PUNJIBHAI vs DAVDA VINODBHAI NANJIBHAI Advocate - A L MAKWANA — 70/2025

Case under The Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 Section 12. Disposed: Uncontested--PARTLY ALLOWED on 20th March 2026.

Case disposed

CRMA J - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION - JMFC

CNR: GJSK050002302025

Filing Number

70/2025

Filing Date

19-Feb-2025

Registration No

70/2025

Registration Date

19-Feb-2025

Court

TALUKA COURT, KHEDBRAHMA

Judge

3-Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

Decision Date

20-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--PARTLY ALLOWED

Last updated 12-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

The Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 Section 12

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.GAMAR PINTUBEN PUNJIBHAI

    Adv. M P PARMAR

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.DAVDA VINODBHAI NANJIBHAI Advocate - A L MAKWANA

  2. 2.DAVDA NANJIBHAI HOMIBHAI

  3. 3.DAVDA LALJIBHAI NANJIBHAI

  4. 4.DAVDA MODIBEN LALJIBHAI

  5. 5.DAVDA JAGDISHBHAI LALJIBHAI

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 20-Mar-2026

    JudegementView PDF

    Summary The court partially granted the petitioner's application under the Domestic Violence Against Women Act, 2005. The Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate found that the respondents (the petitioner's husband, in-laws) committed domestic violence against the petitioner through physical and mental harassment over years, including beatings, threats, and forced separation from her children. The court ordered the respondents to cease harassment, pay ₹25,000 as compensation, provide ₹3,000 monthly maintenance for two months, and reimburse ₹1,000 in case costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 20-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  4. 07-Mar-2026

    Evidence Of Opponent

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  5. 27-Feb-2026

    Evidence Of Opponent

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  6. 17-Feb-2026

    Evidence Of Opponent

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  7. 31-Jan-2026

    Evidence Of Opponent

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  8. 13-Jan-2026

    Evidence Of Opponent

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  9. 03-Jan-2026

    Evidence Of Opponent

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  10. 17-Dec-2025

    Evidence Of Opponent

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  11. 15-Nov-2025

    Evidence Of Opponent

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  12. 01-Nov-2025

    Evidence Of Opponent

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  13. 04-Oct-2025

    Evidence Of Opponent

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  14. 11-Sep-2025

    Evidence Of Applicant

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  15. 26-Aug-2025

    Evidence Of Applicant

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  16. 02-Aug-2025

    Evidence Of Applicant

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  17. 19-Jul-2025

    Evidence Of Applicant

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  18. 02-Jul-2025

    Reply

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  19. 26-May-2025

    Reply

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  20. 03-May-2025

    Reply

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge

  21. 23-Apr-2025

    Reply

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge

  22. 19-Mar-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  23. 19-Feb-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 70/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The court partially granted the petitioner's application under the Domestic Violence Against Women Act, 2005. The Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate found that the respondents (the petitioner's husband, in-laws) committed domestic violence against the petitioner through physical and mental harassment over years, including beatings, threats, and forced separation from her children. The court ordered the respondents to cease harassment, pay ₹25,000 as compensation, provide ₹3,000 monthly maintenance for two months, and reimburse ₹1,000 in case costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case