PATEL MANISHKUMAR DEVCHANDBHAI LAVIN NIDHI LTD IDAR DIRECTOR vs MAHENDRASINH DALPATSINH CHAUHAN Advocate - B M GADHAVI — 2977/2025

Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138. Disposed: Uncontested--LOK ADALAT on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJSK040036792025

Filing Number

2977/2025

Filing Date

30-Sep-2025

Registration No

2977/2025

Registration Date

30-Sep-2025

Court

TALUKA COURT, IDAR

Judge

1-Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--LOK ADALAT

Last updated 12-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.PATEL MANISHKUMAR DEVCHANDBHAI LAVIN NIDHI LTD IDAR DIRECTOR

    Adv. G I KUMPAVAT

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.MAHENDRASINH DALPATSINH CHAUHAN Advocate - B M GADHAVI

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    Summary The court ordered that the case be resolved through the National Lok Adalat (public arbitration) based on the complainant's withdrawal petition (Item 21). The accused was acquitted and discharged under Section 157 of the CrPC, with the court finding insufficient grounds to proceed with criminal charges. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  4. 13-Mar-2026

    Summons - Notice

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  5. 07-Mar-2026

    Summons - Notice

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  6. 05-Feb-2026

    Summons - Notice

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  7. 26-Dec-2025

    Summons - Notice

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  8. 15-Nov-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  9. 30-Sep-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 2977/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The court ordered that the case be resolved through the National Lok Adalat (public arbitration) based on the complainant's withdrawal petition (Item 21). The accused was acquitted and discharged under Section 157 of the CrPC, with the court finding insufficient grounds to proceed with criminal charges. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case