VINAYBHAI RAVIKANT SHETH TRUSTEE OF KAHANBHARATHI VAKHATBHARATHI SARVJANIK HINDU DHARMSHALA IDAR vs KAMLABEN KISHANCHAND SOMAIYA Advocate - S K SOLANKI — 15/2023
Case under Gujarat (bombay) Rents, Hotel and Lodging House Rates Control Act, 1947 Section 12,13,. Status: DEFENDANT EVIDENCE. Next hearing: 01st May 2026.
RCS - REGULAR CIVIL SUIT
CNR: GJSK040022462023
Next Hearing
01st May 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
15/2023
Filing Date
15-04-2023
Registration No
15/2023
Registration Date
15-04-2023
Court
TALUKA COURT, IDAR
Judge
1-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE & ADDL. CJM
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
VINAYBHAI RAVIKANT SHETH TRUSTEE OF KAHANBHARATHI VAKHATBHARATHI SARVJANIK HINDU DHARMSHALA IDAR
Adv. A G SANKHESARA
AJAYBHAI BALKRUSHNA MANIYA
SUBHASHBHAI BALKRUSHNA MANIYA
VIJAYKUMAR RAVISHANKAR JANI
VASUDEV MANILAL THAKAR AND VINAYBHA SHETH AUTHORISED PERSON OF PRAKASHBHA SOMALAL SHAH
Respondent(s)
KAMLABEN KISHANCHAND SOMAIYA Advocate - S K SOLANKI
Hearing History
Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE & ADDL. CJM
DEFENDANT EVIDENCE
DEFENDANT EVIDENCE
DEFENDANT EVIDENCE
DEFENDANT EVIDENCE
DEFENDANT EVIDENCE
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 07-03-2026 | DEFENDANT EVIDENCE | |
| 20-02-2026 | DEFENDANT EVIDENCE | |
| 22-01-2026 | DEFENDANT EVIDENCE | |
| 23-12-2025 | DEFENDANT EVIDENCE | |
| 24-11-2025 | DEFENDANT EVIDENCE |
Interim Orders
The court allowed the landlord's petition for eviction under Section 13(1)(k) of the Rent Act, finding that the rented cinema premises had remained unused for more than six months without reasonable cause. The court ordered the defendants (respondents) to vacate the property and prohibited them from making any alterations, subletting, or transferring the premises until final judgment. The tenant's defense that cinema operations were disrupted due to COVID-19 was rejected as insufficient justification for non-use. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The court allowed the landlord's petition for eviction under Section 13(1)(k) of the Rent Act, finding that the rented cinema premises had remained unused for more than six months without reasonable cause. The court ordered the defendants (respondents) to vacate the property and prohibited them from making any alterations, subletting, or transferring the premises until final judgment. The tenant's defense that cinema operations were disrupted due to COVID-19 was rejected as insufficient justification for non-use. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts