THE STATE OF GUJARAT vs RAMESHBHAI MOTIBHAI BARIYA — 1779/2023

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 279,337,338,. Disposed: Uncontested--DISPOSED OF on 14th March 2026.

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJSK040019312023

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

1779/2023

Filing Date

24-03-2023

Registration No

1779/2023

Registration Date

24-03-2023

Court

TALUKA COURT, IDAR

Judge

8-ADDI CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

14th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--DISPOSED OF

FIR Details

FIR Number

795

Police Station

JADAR POLICE STATION - SABARKANTHA DISTRICT

Year

2021

Acts & Sections

INDIAN PENAL CODE Section 279,337,338,
MOTOR VEHICLES ACT, 1988 Section 177,184,134B,

Petitioner(s)

THE STATE OF GUJARAT

Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

RAMESHBHAI MOTIBHAI BARIYA

Hearing History

Judge: 8-ADDI CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C

14-03-2026

Disposed

07-03-2026

WARRANT OF ARREST

26-02-2026

WARRANT OF ARREST

22-01-2026

WARRANT OF ARREST

06-12-2025

WARRANT OF ARREST

Final Orders / Judgements

14-03-2026
ORDER

The Gujarat High Court ordered the cessation of criminal proceedings against the accused under Section 258 of the Criminal Procedure Code, directing his release on bail without conditions, as the police failed to apprehend him despite adequate efforts and further detention would not yield productive results. The court found the police's negligence in arresting the accused and deemed prolonged pendency of the case unjustifiable, emphasizing that justice requires swift resolution rather than indefinite postponement. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The Gujarat High Court ordered the cessation of criminal proceedings against the accused under Section 258 of the Criminal Procedure Code, directing his release on bail without conditions, as the police failed to apprehend him despite adequate efforts and further detention would not yield productive results. The court found the police's negligence in arresting the accused and deemed prolonged pendency of the case unjustifiable, emphasizing that justice requires swift resolution rather than indefinite postponement. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

TALUKA COURT, IDAR All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case