JYANTIBHAI HIRABHAI PARMAR vs EJAJ AYUBHAI MEMON Advocate - B N GADHAVI — 908/2024
Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138,. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 06th April 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJSK040011092024
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
908/2024
Filing Date
27-03-2024
Registration No
908/2024
Registration Date
27-03-2024
Court
TALUKA COURT, IDAR
Judge
8-ADDI CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
06th April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
JYANTIBHAI HIRABHAI PARMAR
Adv. A G SANKHESARA
Respondent(s)
EJAJ AYUBHAI MEMON Advocate - B N GADHAVI
Hearing History
Judge: 8-ADDI CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Disposed
JUDGEMENT
JUDGEMENT
JUDGEMENT
JUDGEMENT
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 06-04-2026 | Disposed | |
| 07-03-2026 | JUDGEMENT | |
| 03-03-2026 | JUDGEMENT | |
| 06-02-2026 | JUDGEMENT | |
| 22-01-2026 | JUDGEMENT |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary The court acquitted the accused Ejaj Ayobbhai Memon of charges under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, finding insufficient evidence that the cheque was issued for a legal debt or liability. The court noted that the complainant failed to conclusively prove the purpose of the cheque and the accused presented credible evidence of partial repayment through other means before the cheque was issued. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The court acquitted the accused Ejaj Ayobbhai Memon of charges under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, finding insufficient evidence that the cheque was issued for a legal debt or liability. The court noted that the complainant failed to conclusively prove the purpose of the cheque and the accused presented credible evidence of partial repayment through other means before the cheque was issued. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts