The State Of Gujarat vs LACHCHHARAM KHUBIRAM HARET GURJAR Advocate - R K BRAHMBHATT — 1579/2025

Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 106(1),281. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 30th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJSK030019132025

Filing Number

1579/2025

Filing Date

28-Aug-2025

Registration No

1579/2025

Registration Date

28-Aug-2025

Court

TALUKA COURT, PRANTIJ

Judge

1-Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

Decision Date

30-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL

Last updated 12-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

690

Police Station

PRANTIJ POLICE STATION - SABARKANTHA DISTRICT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 106(1),281
Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 177,184,134(B)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.The State Of Gujarat

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.LACHCHHARAM KHUBIRAM HARET GURJAR Advocate - R K BRAHMBHATT

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 30-Mar-2026

    JudegementView PDF

    The Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate Court in Prantij acquitted the accused of charges under IPC Sections 106(1), 281, and Motor Vehicle Act Sections 177, 184, and 134, finding insufficient evidence that the accused recklessly or negligently operated the vehicle causing the victim's death. The court determined that while the victim died in a hit-and-run incident, the prosecution failed to establish beyond reasonable doubt that the accused was driving dangerously or without due care at the time of the accident. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 30-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  4. 17-Mar-2026

    Further Statement

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  5. 10-Mar-2026

    Further Statement

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  6. 07-Mar-2026

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  7. 25-Feb-2026

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  8. 12-Feb-2026

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  9. 27-Jan-2026

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  10. 29-Dec-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  11. 03-Dec-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  12. 13-Nov-2025

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  13. 29-Sep-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  14. 28-Aug-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 1579/2025

casestatus.in Summary

The Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate Court in Prantij acquitted the accused of charges under IPC Sections 106(1), 281, and Motor Vehicle Act Sections 177, 184, and 134, finding insufficient evidence that the accused recklessly or negligently operated the vehicle causing the victim's death. The court determined that while the victim died in a hit-and-run incident, the prosecution failed to establish beyond reasonable doubt that the accused was driving dangerously or without due care at the time of the accident. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case