The State Of Gujarat vs LACHCHHARAM KHUBIRAM HARET GURJAR Advocate - R K BRAHMBHATT — 1579/2025
Case under Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 106(1),281,. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 30th March 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJSK030019132025
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
1579/2025
Filing Date
28-08-2025
Registration No
1579/2025
Registration Date
28-08-2025
Court
TALUKA COURT, PRANTIJ
Judge
1-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE & ADDL. CJM
Decision Date
30th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL
FIR Details
FIR Number
690
Police Station
PRANTIJ POLICE STATION - SABARKANTHA DISTRICT
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
The State Of Gujarat
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
LACHCHHARAM KHUBIRAM HARET GURJAR Advocate - R K BRAHMBHATT
Hearing History
Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE & ADDL. CJM
Disposed
FURTHER STATEMENT
FURTHER STATEMENT
EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION
EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 30-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 17-03-2026 | FURTHER STATEMENT | |
| 10-03-2026 | FURTHER STATEMENT | |
| 07-03-2026 | EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION | |
| 25-02-2026 | EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION |
Final Orders / Judgements
The Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate Court in Prantij acquitted the accused of charges under IPC Sections 106(1), 281, and Motor Vehicle Act Sections 177, 184, and 134, finding insufficient evidence that the accused recklessly or negligently operated the vehicle causing the victim's death. The court determined that while the victim died in a hit-and-run incident, the prosecution failed to establish beyond reasonable doubt that the accused was driving dangerously or without due care at the time of the accident. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate Court in Prantij acquitted the accused of charges under IPC Sections 106(1), 281, and Motor Vehicle Act Sections 177, 184, and 134, finding insufficient evidence that the accused recklessly or negligently operated the vehicle causing the victim's death. The court determined that while the victim died in a hit-and-run incident, the prosecution failed to establish beyond reasonable doubt that the accused was driving dangerously or without due care at the time of the accident. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts