MAHETA TANAVIBEN GUNAVANTBHAI-POWER OF ATERNY NARASINGHANI KIRANKUMAR TARACHANDBHAI vs GOVERMENT OF GUJARAT Advocate - DGP — 5/2021

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 1. Disposed: Uncontested--WITHDRAWN on 07th April 2026.

Case disposed

CMA SC - CIVIL MISC. APPLICATION - SR/CIVIL/SMALL CAUSE COU

CNR: GJSK030014552021

Filing Number

5/2021

Filing Date

07-Apr-2021

Registration No

5/2021

Registration Date

07-Apr-2021

Court

TALUKA COURT, PRANTIJ

Judge

1-Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

Decision Date

07-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--WITHDRAWN

Last updated 12-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section 1

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.MAHETA TANAVIBEN GUNAVANTBHAI-POWER OF ATERNY NARASINGHANI KIRANKUMAR TARACHANDBHAI

    Adv. A.C.PANDYA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.GOVERMENT OF GUJARAT Advocate - DGP

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 07-Apr-2026

    OrderView PDF

    The court dismissed the appeal, holding that the original order cannot be modified as it was technically sound and proper. The court reasoned that since the lower court's decision was justified and no substantial grounds existed for interference, the appeal lacked merit and was consequently rejected with the condition that the appellant must bear the court costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 07-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  4. 07-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  5. 17-Jan-2026

    Hearing

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  6. 20-Dec-2025

    Hearing

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  7. 15-Nov-2025

    Hearing

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  8. 04-Oct-2025

    Hearing

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  9. 30-Aug-2025

    Hearing

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  10. 19-Jul-2025

    Hearing

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  11. 21-Jun-2025

    Hearing

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  12. 06-May-2025

    Hearing

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  13. 11-Apr-2025

    Hearing

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  14. 01-Mar-2025

    Hearing

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  15. 18-Jan-2025

    Hearing

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  16. 18-Jan-2025

    Hearing

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  17. 21-Dec-2024

    Hearing

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  18. 14-Nov-2024

    Hearing

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  19. 11-Oct-2024

    Hearing

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  20. 31-Aug-2024

    Hearing

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  21. 20-Jul-2024

    Hearing

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  22. 15-Jun-2024

    Hearing

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  23. 01-May-2024

    Hearing

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  24. 30-Mar-2024

    Hearing

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  25. 26-Feb-2024

    Hearing

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  26. 30-Jan-2024

    Hearing

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  27. 14-Dec-2023

    Hearing

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  28. 04-Nov-2023

    Hearing

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  29. 26-Sep-2023

    Hearing

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  30. 19-Aug-2023

    Hearing

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  31. 12-Jul-2023

    Hearing

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  32. 23-Jun-2023

    Hearing

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  33. 03-May-2023

    Hearing

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  34. 20-Mar-2023

    Hearing

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  35. 03-Feb-2023

    Reply

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  36. 05-Jan-2023

    Reply

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  37. 03-Dec-2022

    Reply

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  38. 07-Nov-2022

    Reply

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  39. 11-Oct-2022

    Reply

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  40. 12-Sep-2022

    Reply

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  41. 22-Aug-2022

    Reply

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  42. 25-Jul-2022

    Reply

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  43. 01-Jul-2022

    Reply

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  44. 10-May-2022

    Reply

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  45. 18-Apr-2022

    Reply

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  46. 23-Mar-2022

    Reply

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  47. 07-Mar-2022

    Reply

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  48. 07-Feb-2022

    Notice To Opponents

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  49. 05-Jan-2022

    Notice To Opponents

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  50. 08-Dec-2021

    Notice To Opponents

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  51. 03-Nov-2021

    Notice To Opponents

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  52. 06-Oct-2021

    Notice To Opponents

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  53. 08-Sep-2021

    Notice To Opponents

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  54. 09-Aug-2021

    Notice To Opponents

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  55. 13-Jul-2021

    Notice To Opponents

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  56. 21-Jun-2021

    Notice To Opponents

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  57. 27-Apr-2021

    Notice To Opponents

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  58. 07-Apr-2021

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  59. 07-Apr-2021

    Case filed

    Registration No. 5/2021

casestatus.in Summary

The court dismissed the appeal, holding that the original order cannot be modified as it was technically sound and proper. The court reasoned that since the lower court's decision was justified and no substantial grounds existed for interference, the appeal lacked merit and was consequently rejected with the condition that the appellant must bear the court costs. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case