The State Of Gujarat vs INDUBHAI RAJABHAI SUSARA(BHARVAD) Advocate - M D ZALA — 707/2024
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 279,304A. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 30th March 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJSK030009002024
Filing Number
707/2024
Filing Date
09-Apr-2024
Registration No
707/2024
Registration Date
09-Apr-2024
Court
TALUKA COURT, PRANTIJ
Judge
1-Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
Decision Date
30-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL
Last updated 12-Apr-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
1177
Police Station
PRANTIJ POLICE STATION - SABARKANTHA DISTRICT
Year
2023
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.The State Of Gujarat
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
-
1.INDUBHAI RAJABHAI SUSARA(BHARVAD) Advocate - M D ZALA
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
30-Mar-2026
JudegementView PDF
Case Summary Court Decision: The Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate Court, Prantij acquitted the accused of charges under Indian Penal Code Sections 279, 304(a), and Motor Vehicles Act Sections 177, 184, 134. The court found that the prosecution failed to establish the guilt of the accused beyond reasonable doubt, as the eyewitness testimonies were inconsistent and the documentary evidence did not adequately support the charges of rash or negligent driving causing death. Key Reasoning: The court noted significant contradictions in witness statements regarding the vehicle's operation and the circumstances of the fatal accident, insufficient evidence of criminal negligence, and lack of credible forensic support for the allegations against the accused driver. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
30-Mar-2026
Disposed
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
17-Mar-2026
Further Statement
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
10-Mar-2026
Further Statement
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
07-Mar-2026
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
25-Feb-2026
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
02-Feb-2026
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
16-Jan-2026
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
03-Dec-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
07-Nov-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
09-Oct-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
09-Sep-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
08-Aug-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
03-Jul-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
29-May-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
30-Apr-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
12-Mar-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
28-Jan-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
18-Dec-2024
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
26-Nov-2024
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
05-Nov-2024
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
24-Sep-2024
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
22-Aug-2024
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
24-Jul-2024
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
24-Jun-2024
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
04-Jun-2024
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM
-
08-May-2024
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
09-Apr-2024
Case filed
Registration No. 707/2024
Case Summary Court Decision: The Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate Court, Prantij acquitted the accused of charges under Indian Penal Code Sections 279, 304(a), and Motor Vehicles Act Sections 177, 184, 134. The court found that the prosecution failed to establish the guilt of the accused beyond reasonable doubt, as the eyewitness testimonies were inconsistent and the documentary evidence did not adequately support the charges of rash or negligent driving causing death. Key Reasoning: The court noted significant contradictions in witness statements regarding the vehicle's operation and the circumstances of the fatal accident, insufficient evidence of criminal negligence, and lack of credible forensic support for the allegations against the accused driver. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts