The State Of Gujarat vs INDUBHAI RAJABHAI SUSARA(BHARVAD) Advocate - M D ZALA — 707/2024

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 279,304A,. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 30th March 2026.

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJSK030009002024

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

707/2024

Filing Date

09-04-2024

Registration No

707/2024

Registration Date

09-04-2024

Court

TALUKA COURT, PRANTIJ

Judge

1-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE & ADDL. CJM

Decision Date

30th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL

FIR Details

FIR Number

1177

Police Station

PRANTIJ POLICE STATION - SABARKANTHA DISTRICT

Year

2023

Acts & Sections

INDIAN PENAL CODE Section 279,304A,
MOTOR VEHICLES ACT, 1988 Section 177,184,134-B

Petitioner(s)

The State Of Gujarat

Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

INDUBHAI RAJABHAI SUSARA(BHARVAD) Advocate - M D ZALA

Hearing History

Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE & ADDL. CJM

30-03-2026

Disposed

17-03-2026

FURTHER STATEMENT

10-03-2026

FURTHER STATEMENT

07-03-2026

EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION

25-02-2026

EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION

Final Orders / Judgements

30-03-2026
JUDEGEMENT

Case Summary Court Decision: The Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate Court, Prantij acquitted the accused of charges under Indian Penal Code Sections 279, 304(a), and Motor Vehicles Act Sections 177, 184, 134. The court found that the prosecution failed to establish the guilt of the accused beyond reasonable doubt, as the eyewitness testimonies were inconsistent and the documentary evidence did not adequately support the charges of rash or negligent driving causing death. Key Reasoning: The court noted significant contradictions in witness statements regarding the vehicle's operation and the circumstances of the fatal accident, insufficient evidence of criminal negligence, and lack of credible forensic support for the allegations against the accused driver. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary Court Decision: The Additional Chief Judicial Magistrate Court, Prantij acquitted the accused of charges under Indian Penal Code Sections 279, 304(a), and Motor Vehicles Act Sections 177, 184, 134. The court found that the prosecution failed to establish the guilt of the accused beyond reasonable doubt, as the eyewitness testimonies were inconsistent and the documentary evidence did not adequately support the charges of rash or negligent driving causing death. Key Reasoning: The court noted significant contradictions in witness statements regarding the vehicle's operation and the circumstances of the fatal accident, insufficient evidence of criminal negligence, and lack of credible forensic support for the allegations against the accused driver. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

TALUKA COURT, PRANTIJ All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case