The State Of Gujarat vs gumansinh kalusinh rathod Advocate - D A DARBAR — 214/2026

Case under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 185. Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJSK030003022026

e-Filing Number

21-11-2025

Filing Number

214/2026

Filing Date

13-Feb-2026

Registration No

214/2026

Registration Date

13-Feb-2026

Court

TALUKA COURT, PRANTIJ

Judge

3-Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY

Last updated 12-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

1078

Police Station

PRANTIJ POLICE STATION - SABARKANTHA DISTRICT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 185
Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 66(1)(b)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.The State Of Gujarat

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.gumansinh kalusinh rathod Advocate - D A DARBAR

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    The court convicted the accused, Gumanbhai Kalusibhai Rathod, under IPC Section 185 (driving under influence) and Prohibition Act Section 65(1), finding him guilty of operating a vehicle while intoxicated. The accused was sentenced to a fine of ₹600 (or two days simple imprisonment if fine is not paid), with the court considering it his first offense and the circumstances of the case while imposing the minimum sentence to serve the interests of justice. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  4. 07-Mar-2026

    Summons - Notice

    Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  5. 06-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 13-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 214/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court convicted the accused, Gumanbhai Kalusibhai Rathod, under IPC Section 185 (driving under influence) and Prohibition Act Section 65(1), finding him guilty of operating a vehicle while intoxicated. The accused was sentenced to a fine of ₹600 (or two days simple imprisonment if fine is not paid), with the court considering it his first offense and the circumstances of the case while imposing the minimum sentence to serve the interests of justice. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case