The State Of Gujarat vs pravinkumar natavarbhai bhil Advocate - M I RANA — 161/2026

Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Police Act, 1951 Section 135. Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJSK030002202026

e-Filing Number

02-12-2025

Filing Number

161/2026

Filing Date

05-Feb-2026

Registration No

161/2026

Registration Date

05-Feb-2026

Court

TALUKA COURT, PRANTIJ

Judge

3-Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY

Last updated 12-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

1152

Police Station

PRANTIJ POLICE STATION - SABARKANTHA DISTRICT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Gujarat (Bombay) Police Act, 1951 Section 135

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.The State Of Gujarat

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.pravinkumar natavarbhai bhil Advocate - M I RANA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    The court found the accused guilty under Section 275 of the Indian Penal Code (read with Section 135 of the Gujarat Police Act) for a criminal offense. The court sentenced the accused to a fine of Rs. 100 (or alternatively, one day of simple imprisonment if the fine is not paid), considering the accused's first-time offense, lack of legal knowledge, and mitigating circumstances regarding court delays and witness availability. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  4. 07-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 05-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 161/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court found the accused guilty under Section 275 of the Indian Penal Code (read with Section 135 of the Gujarat Police Act) for a criminal offense. The court sentenced the accused to a fine of Rs. 100 (or alternatively, one day of simple imprisonment if the fine is not paid), considering the accused's first-time offense, lack of legal knowledge, and mitigating circumstances regarding court delays and witness availability. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case