The State Of Gujarat vs dahyabhai sabhabhai nayak Advocate - M I RANA — 160/2026

Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Police Act, 1951 Section 135. Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJSK030002192026

e-Filing Number

24-12-2025

Filing Number

160/2026

Filing Date

05-Feb-2026

Registration No

160/2026

Registration Date

05-Feb-2026

Court

TALUKA COURT, PRANTIJ

Judge

3-Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY

Last updated 12-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

1242

Police Station

PRANTIJ POLICE STATION - SABARKANTHA DISTRICT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Gujarat (Bombay) Police Act, 1951 Section 135

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.The State Of Gujarat

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.dahyabhai sabhabhai nayak Advocate - M I RANA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    Summary The court found the accused guilty under IPC Section 135 (voluntarily causing hurt) and sentenced him to a fine of Rs. 100 (or 2 days simple imprisonment in default). The judgment notes the accused's voluntary guilty plea, lack of prior criminal record, and ignorance of law as mitigating factors that warranted a minimal sentence while still serving the interests of justice. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  4. 07-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 05-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 160/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The court found the accused guilty under IPC Section 135 (voluntarily causing hurt) and sentenced him to a fine of Rs. 100 (or 2 days simple imprisonment in default). The judgment notes the accused's voluntary guilty plea, lack of prior criminal record, and ignorance of law as mitigating factors that warranted a minimal sentence while still serving the interests of justice. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case