The State Of Gujarat vs kiransinh hiraji khant — 142/2026

Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65(a)(a). Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJSK030002012026

e-Filing Number

02-12-2025

Filing Number

142/2026

Filing Date

03-Feb-2026

Registration No

142/2026

Registration Date

03-Feb-2026

Court

TALUKA COURT, PRANTIJ

Judge

3-Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY

Last updated 12-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

1100

Police Station

PRANTIJ POLICE STATION - SABARKANTHA DISTRICT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65(a)(a)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.The State Of Gujarat

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.kiransinh hiraji khant

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    The court convicted the accused, Kiransinh Hiraaji Khantt, under Section 65-A-A of the Prohibition Act and sentenced him to a fine of Rs. 100 (with an alternative of 3 days simple imprisonment if the fine is not paid), considering this was his first offense and he had voluntarily confessed to the crime. The court also imposed an additional sentence as per the prescribed legal framework while taking into account the accused's circumstances and ensuring minimum punishment as per established precedent. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  4. 07-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 03-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 142/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court convicted the accused, Kiransinh Hiraaji Khantt, under Section 65-A-A of the Prohibition Act and sentenced him to a fine of Rs. 100 (with an alternative of 3 days simple imprisonment if the fine is not paid), considering this was his first offense and he had voluntarily confessed to the crime. The court also imposed an additional sentence as per the prescribed legal framework while taking into account the accused's circumstances and ensuring minimum punishment as per established precedent. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case