The State Of Gujarat vs punjsinh kubersinh rathod — 141/2026

Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 66(1)(b),85(1). Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJSK030002002026

e-Filing Number

02-12-2025

Filing Number

141/2026

Filing Date

03-Feb-2026

Registration No

141/2026

Registration Date

03-Feb-2026

Court

TALUKA COURT, PRANTIJ

Judge

3-Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY

Last updated 12-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

1176

Police Station

PRANTIJ POLICE STATION - SABARKANTHA DISTRICT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 66(1)(b),85(1)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.The State Of Gujarat

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.punjsinh kubersinh rathod

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    The court convicted the accused under the Prohibition Act (Sections 85(1) and 66(1)B) for consuming and publicly displaying intoxicated behavior while under the influence of alcohol without proper permit. The accused voluntarily admitted guilt and, considering it was a first offense with no prior criminal history and assurance against future violations, the court sentenced him to a fine of Rs. 100 (one hundred rupees) or, in default, two days simple imprisonment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  4. 09-Mar-2026

    Summons - Notice

    Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  5. 07-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 03-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 141/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court convicted the accused under the Prohibition Act (Sections 85(1) and 66(1)B) for consuming and publicly displaying intoxicated behavior while under the influence of alcohol without proper permit. The accused voluntarily admitted guilt and, considering it was a first offense with no prior criminal history and assurance against future violations, the court sentenced him to a fine of Rs. 100 (one hundred rupees) or, in default, two days simple imprisonment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case