The State Of Gujarat vs chiragkumar kacharsinh jadav — 118/2026

Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 66(1)(b),85(1). Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJSK030001652026

e-Filing Number

08-01-2026

Filing Number

118/2026

Filing Date

28-Jan-2026

Registration No

118/2026

Registration Date

28-Jan-2026

Court

TALUKA COURT, PRANTIJ

Judge

3-Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY

Last updated 12-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

1301

Police Station

PRANTIJ POLICE STATION - SABARKANTHA DISTRICT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 66(1)(b),85(1)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.The State Of Gujarat

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.chiragkumar kacharsinh jadav

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    The court convicted the accused Chiragkumar Kacharsinh Jadav under the Prohibition Act for consuming alcohol without a permit and behaving disruptively in public, imposing a fine of ₹100 with an alternative two-day simple imprisonment. The accused voluntarily admitted guilt and claimed it was his first offense with no criminal intent, which the court considered while imposing the minimum sentence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  4. 07-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 28-Jan-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 118/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court convicted the accused Chiragkumar Kacharsinh Jadav under the Prohibition Act for consuming alcohol without a permit and behaving disruptively in public, imposing a fine of ₹100 with an alternative two-day simple imprisonment. The accused voluntarily admitted guilt and claimed it was his first offense with no criminal intent, which the court considered while imposing the minimum sentence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case