The State Of Gujarat vs mukeshje manaji makavana — 115/2026

Case under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 185. Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJSK030001622026

e-Filing Number

08-01-2026

Filing Number

115/2026

Filing Date

28-Jan-2026

Registration No

115/2026

Registration Date

28-Jan-2026

Court

TALUKA COURT, PRANTIJ

Judge

3-Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY

Last updated 12-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

1341

Police Station

PRANTIJ POLICE STATION - SABARKANTHA DISTRICT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 185
Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 66(1)(b)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.The State Of Gujarat

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.mukeshje manaji makavana

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    The court found the accused guilty under IPC Section 185 and Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 66(1) for drunk driving and sentenced him to a fine of Rs. 600 (or Rs. 750 in default), with 2 days simple imprisonment if the fine remained unpaid. The court considered it the accused's first offense and, noting ignorance of law as a mitigating factor, imposed a lenient sentence to serve the interests of justice. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  4. 12-Mar-2026

    Summons - Notice

    Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  5. 10-Mar-2026

    Summons - Notice

    Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  6. 07-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 28-Jan-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 115/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court found the accused guilty under IPC Section 185 and Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Section 66(1) for drunk driving and sentenced him to a fine of Rs. 600 (or Rs. 750 in default), with 2 days simple imprisonment if the fine remained unpaid. The court considered it the accused's first offense and, noting ignorance of law as a mitigating factor, imposed a lenient sentence to serve the interests of justice. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case