The State Of Gujarat vs bharatbhai kantibhai vaghela Advocate - S D PANDYA — 112/2026

Case under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 185. Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJSK030001592026

e-Filing Number

08-01-2026

Filing Number

112/2026

Filing Date

28-Jan-2026

Registration No

112/2026

Registration Date

28-Jan-2026

Court

TALUKA COURT, PRANTIJ

Judge

3-Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY

Last updated 12-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

1272

Police Station

PRANTIJ POLICE STATION - SABARKANTHA DISTRICT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 185
Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 66(1)(b)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.The State Of Gujarat

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.bharatbhai kantibhai vaghela Advocate - S D PANDYA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    The court convicted the accused, Bharatbhai Kantibhai Waghelă, under IPC Sections 185 and 67(1) of the Prohibition Act, sentencing him to pay a fine of ₹600 (or 2 days simple imprisonment in default). The judgment considered the accused's first-time offender status, lack of criminal knowledge, and pending cases in deciding on a lenient sentence while maintaining justice. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  4. 07-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 28-Jan-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 112/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court convicted the accused, Bharatbhai Kantibhai Waghelă, under IPC Sections 185 and 67(1) of the Prohibition Act, sentencing him to pay a fine of ₹600 (or 2 days simple imprisonment in default). The judgment considered the accused's first-time offender status, lack of criminal knowledge, and pending cases in deciding on a lenient sentence while maintaining justice. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case