The State Of Gujarat vs dhirajkuamr premkumar rajput Advocate - D A DARBAR — 111/2026

Case under Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 185. Disposed: Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJSK030001582026

e-Filing Number

24-12-2025

Filing Number

111/2026

Filing Date

28-Jan-2026

Registration No

111/2026

Registration Date

28-Jan-2026

Court

TALUKA COURT, PRANTIJ

Judge

3-Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--PLEAD GUILTY

Last updated 12-Apr-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

1230

Police Station

PRANTIJ POLICE STATION - SABARKANTHA DISTRICT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

Motor Vehicles Act, 1988 Section 185
Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 66(1)(b)

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.The State Of Gujarat

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.dhirajkuamr premkumar rajput Advocate - D A DARBAR

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    The court found the accused, Dhirajkumar Premkumar Rajput, guilty under IPC Section 185 (driving under influence of alcohol) and Probation of Offenders Act Section 65(1). The accused was sentenced to a fine of ₹600 (or 2 days simple imprisonment in default), with the court considering it his first offense and exercising leniency while balancing the interests of justice and public safety. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  4. 07-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 28-Jan-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 111/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The court found the accused, Dhirajkumar Premkumar Rajput, guilty under IPC Section 185 (driving under influence of alcohol) and Probation of Offenders Act Section 65(1). The accused was sentenced to a fine of ₹600 (or 2 days simple imprisonment in default), with the court considering it his first offense and exercising leniency while balancing the interests of justice and public safety. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case