SHINHAL SATISH PRABHUDAYAL vs RAJUBHAI KACHARABHAI PATEL Advocate - D.A.DARBAR — 61/2015
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 114,420,465,467,468,471. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 02nd April 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJSK030001162015
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
61/2015
Filing Date
19-01-2015
Registration No
61/2015
Registration Date
19-01-2015
Court
TALUKA COURT, PRANTIJ
Judge
1-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE & ADDL. CJM
Decision Date
02nd April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL
FIR Details
FIR Number
I 25
Police Station
PRANTIJ POLICE STATION - SABARKANTHA DISTRICT
Year
2008
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
SHINHAL SATISH PRABHUDAYAL
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
RAJUBHAI KACHARABHAI PATEL Advocate - D.A.DARBAR
Hearing History
Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE & ADDL. CJM
Disposed
FINAL ARGUMENTS
FINAL ARGUMENTS
FINAL ARGUMENTS
FINAL ARGUMENTS
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 02-04-2026 | Disposed | |
| 30-03-2026 | FINAL ARGUMENTS | |
| 27-03-2026 | FINAL ARGUMENTS | |
| 18-03-2026 | FINAL ARGUMENTS | |
| 13-03-2026 | FINAL ARGUMENTS |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary This is a criminal case (C.C. No. 914/2008 with C.C. No. 61/2015) from a Gujarat District Court in which the court acquitted multiple bank employees of charges related to fraudulent bank drafts worth ₹4,84,000 filed under the Indian Penal Code Sections 465, 467, 468, 471, 420, and 114. The court found insufficient evidence to prove the prosecution's allegations beyond reasonable doubt and held that the testimonies of accused persons could not be discredited based on unsubstantiated suspicions alone, resulting in acquittal of all defendants. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary This is a criminal case (C.C. No. 914/2008 with C.C. No. 61/2015) from a Gujarat District Court in which the court acquitted multiple bank employees of charges related to fraudulent bank drafts worth ₹4,84,000 filed under the Indian Penal Code Sections 465, 467, 468, 471, 420, and 114. The court found insufficient evidence to prove the prosecution's allegations beyond reasonable doubt and held that the testimonies of accused persons could not be discredited based on unsubstantiated suspicions alone, resulting in acquittal of all defendants. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts