SWASTIK LEASE FINANCE PROP. MAHENDRASINH BHAVSINH VAGHELA vs INDRAJITSINH MAHESHKUMAR RAHEVAR Advocate - N A PANDYA — 7799/2025

Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138,. Disposed: Uncontested--LOK ADALAT on 14th March 2026.

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJSK020100642025

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

7799/2025

Filing Date

12-06-2025

Registration No

7799/2025

Registration Date

12-06-2025

Court

CIVIL COURT HIMATNAGAR

Judge

2-CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE & ADDL. SR. CIVIL JUDGE

Decision Date

14th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--LOK ADALAT

Acts & Sections

NEGOTIABLE INSTRUMENTS ACT, 1881 Section 138,

Petitioner(s)

SWASTIK LEASE FINANCE PROP. MAHENDRASINH BHAVSINH VAGHELA

Adv. A B BHAVSAR

Respondent(s)

INDRAJITSINH MAHESHKUMAR RAHEVAR Advocate - N A PANDYA

Hearing History

Judge: 2-CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE & ADDL. SR. CIVIL JUDGE

14-03-2026

Disposed

07-03-2026

LOK ADALAT

28-02-2026

EVIDENCE OF COMPLAINANT

11-02-2026

EVIDENCE OF COMPLAINANT

08-01-2026

EVIDENCE OF COMPLAINANT

Final Orders / Judgements

14-03-2026
ORDER

The Himmatnagar Chief Judicial Magistrate court dismissed the accused's application seeking video proceedings under Section 33 of the Indian Evidence Act, finding no sufficient grounds to grant the request. The court noted that the accused had not demonstrated why video proceedings were necessary and upheld the standard procedure for trial to proceed in-person in the magistrate's court. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

The Himmatnagar Chief Judicial Magistrate court dismissed the accused's application seeking video proceedings under Section 33 of the Indian Evidence Act, finding no sufficient grounds to grant the request. The court noted that the accused had not demonstrated why video proceedings were necessary and upheld the standard procedure for trial to proceed in-person in the magistrate's court. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

CIVIL COURT HIMATNAGAR All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case