SWASTIK LEASE FINANCE PROP. MAHENDRASINH BHAVSINH VAGHELA vs INDRAJITSINH MAHESHKUMAR RAHEVAR Advocate - N A PANDYA — 7799/2025

Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138. Disposed: Uncontested--LOK ADALAT on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJSK020100642025

Filing Number

7799/2025

Filing Date

12-Jun-2025

Registration No

7799/2025

Registration Date

12-Jun-2025

Court

CIVIL COURT HIMATNAGAR

Judge

2-Chief Judicial Magistrate & Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--LOK ADALAT

Last updated 12-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SWASTIK LEASE FINANCE PROP. MAHENDRASINH BHAVSINH VAGHELA

    Adv. A B BHAVSAR

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.INDRAJITSINH MAHESHKUMAR RAHEVAR Advocate - N A PANDYA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    The Himmatnagar Chief Judicial Magistrate court dismissed the accused's application seeking video proceedings under Section 33 of the Indian Evidence Act, finding no sufficient grounds to grant the request. The court noted that the accused had not demonstrated why video proceedings were necessary and upheld the standard procedure for trial to proceed in-person in the magistrate's court. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Chief Judicial Magistrate & Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge

  4. 07-Mar-2026

    Lok Adalat

    Chief Judicial Magistrate & Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge

  5. 28-Feb-2026

    Evidence Of Complainant

    Chief Judicial Magistrate & Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge

  6. 11-Feb-2026

    Evidence Of Complainant

    Chief Judicial Magistrate & Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge

  7. 08-Jan-2026

    Evidence Of Complainant

    Chief Judicial Magistrate & Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge

  8. 03-Dec-2025

    Evidence Of Complainant

    Chief Judicial Magistrate & Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge

  9. 01-Nov-2025

    Evidence Of Complainant

    Chief Judicial Magistrate & Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge

  10. 25-Sep-2025

    Evidence Of Complainant

    Chief Judicial Magistrate & Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge

  11. 14-Aug-2025

    Evidence Of Complainant

    Chief Judicial Magistrate & Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge

  12. 10-Jul-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  13. 12-Jun-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 7799/2025

casestatus.in Summary

The Himmatnagar Chief Judicial Magistrate court dismissed the accused's application seeking video proceedings under Section 33 of the Indian Evidence Act, finding no sufficient grounds to grant the request. The court noted that the accused had not demonstrated why video proceedings were necessary and upheld the standard procedure for trial to proceed in-person in the magistrate's court. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case