Pujan Investment and Finance Pvt. Ltd. Employee of Shri Prajapati Tarunkumar Jayantibhai vs RAHULKUMAR AMRUTBHAI ROHIT — 233/2026

Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138. Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED on 02nd April 2026.

Case disposed

CR EN - CRIMINAL ENQUIRY

CNR: GJSK020033242026

Filing Number

233/2026

Filing Date

12-Feb-2026

Registration No

233/2026

Registration Date

12-Feb-2026

Court

CIVIL COURT HIMATNAGAR

Judge

6-3rd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

Decision Date

02-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--ALLOWED

Last updated 12-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Pujan Investment and Finance Pvt. Ltd. Employee of Shri Prajapati Tarunkumar Jayantibhai

    Adv. N R MIR

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.RAHULKUMAR AMRUTBHAI ROHIT

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 02-Apr-2026

    OrderView PDF

    Summary The Himatnagar Chief Judicial Magistrate's court converted a complaint inquiry into a criminal case under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instrument Act (cheque dishonor). Following a Karnataka High Court precedent, the court held that no prior hearing of the accused is required before taking cognizance in such cases. The court issued a summons to the accused for April 21, 2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 02-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    3rd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  4. 30-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    3rd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  5. 27-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    3rd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  6. 23-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    3rd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  7. 07-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  8. 12-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 233/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Himatnagar Chief Judicial Magistrate's court converted a complaint inquiry into a criminal case under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instrument Act (cheque dishonor). Following a Karnataka High Court precedent, the court held that no prior hearing of the accused is required before taking cognizance in such cases. The court issued a summons to the accused for April 21, 2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case