The Gujarat State Co.Op.Agri.and Rural Development Bank MUKUNDBHAI MANUBHAI MACHHAR vs NIRUBEN ARVINDBHAI PATEL — 1841/2026

Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138. Disposed: Uncontested--LOK ADALAT on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJSK020022562026

Filing Number

1841/2026

Filing Date

03-Feb-2026

Registration No

1841/2026

Registration Date

03-Feb-2026

Court

CIVIL COURT HIMATNAGAR

Judge

1-Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--LOK ADALAT

Last updated 12-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.The Gujarat State Co.Op.Agri.and Rural Development Bank MUKUNDBHAI MANUBHAI MACHHAR

    Adv. T D SONI

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.NIRUBEN ARVINDBHAI PATEL

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    Summary The court acquitted the accused under Section 257 of the Criminal Procedure Code, finding the prosecution's evidence insufficient to establish guilt under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The court ordered the return of the seized video cassette to the accused and directed the case to be closed, as the prosecution failed to prove the allegations against the accused. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  4. 07-Mar-2026

    Lok Adalat

    Principal Senior CIVIL Judge & Addl. CJM

  5. 03-Feb-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 03-Feb-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 1841/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The court acquitted the accused under Section 257 of the Criminal Procedure Code, finding the prosecution's evidence insufficient to establish guilt under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The court ordered the return of the seized video cassette to the accused and directed the case to be closed, as the prosecution failed to prove the allegations against the accused. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case