AMATON CERAMIC LLP PARTNER SANJAYKUMAR BHAGAVANDAS PRAJAPATI vs MUKESHKUMAR KUMAWAT PROPRIETOR OF TILES WORLD — 125/2026

Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138. Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED on 30th March 2026.

Case disposed

CR EN - CRIMINAL ENQUIRY

CNR: GJSK020016292026

Filing Number

125/2026

Filing Date

28-Jan-2026

Registration No

125/2026

Registration Date

28-Jan-2026

Court

CIVIL COURT HIMATNAGAR

Judge

6-3rd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

Decision Date

30-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--ALLOWED

Last updated 12-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.AMATON CERAMIC LLP PARTNER SANJAYKUMAR BHAGAVANDAS PRAJAPATI

    Adv. J B BHATT

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.MUKESHKUMAR KUMAWAT PROPRIETOR OF TILES WORLD

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 30-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    The Chief Judicial Magistrate, Himatnagar, ordered that the inquiry be converted into a criminal case under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instrument Act, 1881. The court issued a summons against the accused for the date 14/05/2026, relying on the Karnataka High Court's ruling that magistrates need not provide a hearing to the accused before taking cognizance in cheque dishonor cases. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 30-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    3rd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  4. 27-Mar-2026

    Summons - Notice

    3rd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  5. 23-Mar-2026

    Summons - Notice

    3rd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  6. 07-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 28-Jan-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 125/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Chief Judicial Magistrate, Himatnagar, ordered that the inquiry be converted into a criminal case under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instrument Act, 1881. The court issued a summons against the accused for the date 14/05/2026, relying on the Karnataka High Court's ruling that magistrates need not provide a hearing to the accused before taking cognizance in cheque dishonor cases. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case