DEVENDRABHAI PUNJABHAI DESAI vs JASHVANTSINH VAJESINH PARMAR Advocate - N N PANDYA — 959/2025

Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138. Disposed: Uncontested--LOK ADALAT on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJSK020012662025

Filing Number

959/2025

Filing Date

27-Jan-2025

Registration No

959/2025

Registration Date

27-Jan-2025

Court

CIVIL COURT HIMATNAGAR

Judge

2-Chief Judicial Magistrate & Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--LOK ADALAT

Last updated 12-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.DEVENDRABHAI PUNJABHAI DESAI

    Adv. B K PARMAR

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.JASHVANTSINH VAJESINH PARMAR Advocate - N N PANDYA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    The court dismissed the accused's request to proceed with video prosecution under Article 13, finding no sufficient grounds for such an exceptional measure. The accused was acquitted and discharged from charges under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act after the court determined the case lacked merit based on the evidence presented. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 14-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    Chief Judicial Magistrate & Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge

  4. 07-Mar-2026

    Lok Adalat

    Chief Judicial Magistrate & Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge

  5. 31-Jan-2026

    Evidence Of Complainant

    Chief Judicial Magistrate & Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge

  6. 23-Jan-2026

    Evidence Of Complainant

    Chief Judicial Magistrate & Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge

  7. 17-Dec-2025

    Evidence Of Complainant

    Chief Judicial Magistrate & Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge

  8. 11-Nov-2025

    Evidence Of Complainant

    Chief Judicial Magistrate & Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge

  9. 03-Oct-2025

    Evidence Of Complainant

    Chief Judicial Magistrate & Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge

  10. 18-Sep-2025

    Evidence Of Complainant

    Chief Judicial Magistrate & Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge

  11. 01-Aug-2025

    Evidence Of Complainant

    Chief Judicial Magistrate & Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge

  12. 01-Jul-2025

    Evidence Of Complainant

    Chief Judicial Magistrate & Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge

  13. 05-Jun-2025

    Evidence Of Complainant

    Chief Judicial Magistrate & Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge

  14. 18-Apr-2025

    Evidence Of Complainant

    Chief Judicial Magistrate

  15. 25-Feb-2025

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  16. 27-Jan-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. 959/2025

casestatus.in Summary

The court dismissed the accused's request to proceed with video prosecution under Article 13, finding no sufficient grounds for such an exceptional measure. The accused was acquitted and discharged from charges under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act after the court determined the case lacked merit based on the evidence presented. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case