The Sabarkantha D.S.Co.Op.Bank Ltd Shri Neharsinh Anupsinh Jadeja vs JAY LAXMINARAYAN GROUP KOJAN — 70/2026

Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138. Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED on 30th March 2026.

Case disposed

CR EN - CRIMINAL ENQUIRY

CNR: GJSK020010332026

Filing Number

71/2026

Filing Date

19-Jan-2026

Registration No

70/2026

Registration Date

19-Jan-2026

Court

CIVIL COURT HIMATNAGAR

Judge

6-3rd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

Decision Date

30-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--ALLOWED

Last updated 12-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.The Sabarkantha D.S.Co.Op.Bank Ltd Shri Neharsinh Anupsinh Jadeja

    Adv. J R PATEL

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.JAY LAXMINARAYAN GROUP KOJAN

  2. 2.RADHABEN ROHITKUMAR PARMAR

  3. 3.SANGITABEN ASHVINBHAI PARMAR

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 30-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    The Chief Judicial Magistrate, Himatnagar, converted the inquiry into a criminal case under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instrument Act and issued summons to the accused for 14/05/2026, relying on a Karnataka High Court precedent that Magistrates need not give the accused a hearing before taking cognizance in cheque dishonor cases. The court directed registration of the case and directed the accused to appear before the court on the specified date. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 30-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    3rd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  4. 27-Mar-2026

    Summons - Notice

    3rd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  5. 23-Mar-2026

    Summons - Notice

    3rd Addl. Sr. CIVIL Judge & A.C.J.M.

  6. 07-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 19-Jan-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 70/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Chief Judicial Magistrate, Himatnagar, converted the inquiry into a criminal case under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instrument Act and issued summons to the accused for 14/05/2026, relying on a Karnataka High Court precedent that Magistrates need not give the accused a hearing before taking cognizance in cheque dishonor cases. The court directed registration of the case and directed the accused to appear before the court on the specified date. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case