MOHAMADRAFIK SHABBIRHUSEN DOI vs ASHOKKUMAR KALUSINH PARMAR — 71/2026
Case under Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138,. Disposed: Uncontested--ALLOWED on 30th March 2026.
CR EN - CRIMINAL ENQUIRY
CNR: GJSK020010322026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
70/2026
Filing Date
19-01-2026
Registration No
71/2026
Registration Date
20-01-2026
Court
CIVIL COURT HIMATNAGAR
Judge
6-3rd ADDL. SR. CIVIL JUDGE & A.C.J.M.
Decision Date
30th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Uncontested--ALLOWED
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
MOHAMADRAFIK SHABBIRHUSEN DOI
Adv. S M MANDRAWALA
Respondent(s)
ASHOKKUMAR KALUSINH PARMAR
Hearing History
Judge: 6-3rd ADDL. SR. CIVIL JUDGE & A.C.J.M.
Disposed
SUMMONS - NOTICE
SUMMONS - NOTICE
SUMMONS - NOTICE
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 30-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 27-03-2026 | SUMMONS - NOTICE | |
| 23-03-2026 | SUMMONS - NOTICE | |
| 07-03-2026 | SUMMONS - NOTICE |
Final Orders / Judgements
The Chief Judicial Magistrate's court in Himatnagar converted the inquiry into a criminal case under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instrument Act, 1881, based on a cheque bounce complaint. The court ordered the issuance of summons to the accused for appearance on 14/05/2026, relying on Karnataka High Court precedent that magistrates need not provide a hearing to the accused before taking cognizance in cheque dishonor cases. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The Chief Judicial Magistrate's court in Himatnagar converted the inquiry into a criminal case under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instrument Act, 1881, based on a cheque bounce complaint. The court ordered the issuance of summons to the accused for appearance on 14/05/2026, relying on Karnataka High Court precedent that magistrates need not provide a hearing to the accused before taking cognizance in cheque dishonor cases. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts