FAJALBHAI GAFURBHAI MEMON vs BHARAT PULSE MILL, PARTNER A.HAMID A.HAKIM MODASIYA Advocate - M I SABUGAR — 161/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 415,. Status: JUDGEMENT. Next hearing: 23rd April 2026.
CR A - CRIMINAL APPEAL
CNR: GJSK010006422026
Next Hearing
23rd April 2026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
161/2026
Filing Date
07-03-2026
Registration No
161/2026
Registration Date
07-03-2026
Court
DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT HIMATNAGAR
Judge
1-PRINCIPAL DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
FAJALBHAI GAFURBHAI MEMON
Adv. A A KHALAK
Respondent(s)
BHARAT PULSE MILL, PARTNER A.HAMID A.HAKIM MODASIYA Advocate - M I SABUGAR
THE STATE OF GUJARAT
Hearing History
Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE
JUDGEMENT
LOK ADALAT
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 10-04-2026 | JUDGEMENT | |
| 07-03-2026 | LOK ADALAT |
Interim Orders
Summary In Criminal Appeal No. 161 of 2026, the Sessions Court allowed the appellant Fajalbhai Gafurbhai Memon's application for suspension of sentence under Section 430(1) of the Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. The court found that the parties had already reached a compromise settlement and the complainant's grievances were redressed, making continued incarceration unnecessary. The convict was granted enlargement on bail subject to furnishing a surety of Rs. 5,000 and personal bond of the same amount, with conditions to remain present in court during appeal proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary In Criminal Appeal No. 161 of 2026, the Sessions Court allowed the appellant Fajalbhai Gafurbhai Memon's application for suspension of sentence under Section 430(1) of the Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. The court found that the parties had already reached a compromise settlement and the complainant's grievances were redressed, making continued incarceration unnecessary. The convict was granted enlargement on bail subject to furnishing a surety of Rs. 5,000 and personal bond of the same amount, with conditions to remain present in court during appeal proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts