FAJALBHAI GAFURBHAI MEMON vs BHARAT PULSE MILL, PARTNER A.HAMID A.HAKIM MODASIYA Advocate - M I SABUGAR — 161/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 415,. Status: JUDGEMENT. Next hearing: 23rd April 2026.

CR A - CRIMINAL APPEAL

CNR: GJSK010006422026

JUDGEMENT

Next Hearing

23rd April 2026

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

161/2026

Filing Date

07-03-2026

Registration No

161/2026

Registration Date

07-03-2026

Court

DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT HIMATNAGAR

Judge

1-PRINCIPAL DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 415,
NEGOTIABLE INSTRUMENTS ACT, 1881 Section 138,

Petitioner(s)

FAJALBHAI GAFURBHAI MEMON

Adv. A A KHALAK

Respondent(s)

BHARAT PULSE MILL, PARTNER A.HAMID A.HAKIM MODASIYA Advocate - M I SABUGAR

THE STATE OF GUJARAT

Hearing History

Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE

10-04-2026

JUDGEMENT

07-03-2026

LOK ADALAT

Interim Orders

07-03-2026
ORDER

Summary In Criminal Appeal No. 161 of 2026, the Sessions Court allowed the appellant Fajalbhai Gafurbhai Memon's application for suspension of sentence under Section 430(1) of the Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. The court found that the parties had already reached a compromise settlement and the complainant's grievances were redressed, making continued incarceration unnecessary. The convict was granted enlargement on bail subject to furnishing a surety of Rs. 5,000 and personal bond of the same amount, with conditions to remain present in court during appeal proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary In Criminal Appeal No. 161 of 2026, the Sessions Court allowed the appellant Fajalbhai Gafurbhai Memon's application for suspension of sentence under Section 430(1) of the Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. The court found that the parties had already reached a compromise settlement and the complainant's grievances were redressed, making continued incarceration unnecessary. The convict was granted enlargement on bail subject to furnishing a surety of Rs. 5,000 and personal bond of the same amount, with conditions to remain present in court during appeal proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT HIMATNAGAR All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case