FAJALBHAI GAFURBHAI MEMON vs BHARAT PULSE MILL, PARTNER A.HAMID A.HAKIM MODASIYA Advocate - M I SABUGAR — 161/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 415. Status: Judgement. Next hearing: 23rd April 2026.

Judgement Next hearing 23-Apr-2026 this date has passed

CR A - CRIMINAL APPEAL

CNR: GJSK010006422026

Filing Number

161/2026

Filing Date

07-Mar-2026

Registration No

161/2026

Registration Date

07-Mar-2026

Court

DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT HIMATNAGAR

Judge

1-Principal District & Sessions Judge

Last updated 12-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 415
Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.FAJALBHAI GAFURBHAI MEMON

    Adv. A A KHALAK

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.BHARAT PULSE MILL, PARTNER A.HAMID A.HAKIM MODASIYA Advocate - M I SABUGAR

  2. 2.THE STATE OF GUJARAT

Case History

  1. 23-Apr-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 10-Apr-2026

    Judgement

    Principal District & Sessions Judge

  3. 07-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    Summary In Criminal Appeal No. 161 of 2026, the Sessions Court allowed the appellant Fajalbhai Gafurbhai Memon's application for suspension of sentence under Section 430(1) of the Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. The court found that the parties had already reached a compromise settlement and the complainant's grievances were redressed, making continued incarceration unnecessary. The convict was granted enlargement on bail subject to furnishing a surety of Rs. 5,000 and personal bond of the same amount, with conditions to remain present in court during appeal proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  4. 07-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  5. 07-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 161/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary In Criminal Appeal No. 161 of 2026, the Sessions Court allowed the appellant Fajalbhai Gafurbhai Memon's application for suspension of sentence under Section 430(1) of the Bharatiya Nagrik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. The court found that the parties had already reached a compromise settlement and the complainant's grievances were redressed, making continued incarceration unnecessary. The convict was granted enlargement on bail subject to furnishing a surety of Rs. 5,000 and personal bond of the same amount, with conditions to remain present in court during appeal proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case