DHANABHAI SHAMALBHAI CHENVA vs PUJAN FINANCE PVT. LTD., AUTHO. PERSON PRAJAPATI TARUNKUMAR JAYANTIBHAI Advocate - N R MIR — 160/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 415. Status: Lok Adalat. Next hearing: 09th May 2026.

Lok Adalat Next hearing 09-May-2026 this date has passed

CR A - CRIMINAL APPEAL

CNR: GJSK010006392026

Filing Number

160/2026

Filing Date

07-Mar-2026

Registration No

160/2026

Registration Date

07-Mar-2026

Court

DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT HIMATNAGAR

Judge

1-Principal District & Sessions Judge

Last updated 12-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 415
Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.DHANABHAI SHAMALBHAI CHENVA

    Adv. K J KUMPAVAT

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.PUJAN FINANCE PVT. LTD., AUTHO. PERSON PRAJAPATI TARUNKUMAR JAYANTIBHAI Advocate - N R MIR

  2. 2.THE STATE OF GUJARAT

Case History

  1. 09-May-2026

    Next hearingPending

  2. 07-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    Summary: The appellate court allowed the application for suspension of sentence in Criminal Appeal No. 160 of 2026 against Dhanabhai Shamalbhai Chenva. The court exercised discretion under Section 430 of B.N.S.S. to suspend the conviction sentence, as the parties had reached a compromise and the complainant's grievances were redressed. The convict was granted enlargement on bail subject to furnishing a surety of Rs. 5,000 and personal bond of the same amount, with conditions to remain present in court during the appeal proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 07-Mar-2026

    Lok Adalat

    Principal District & Sessions Judge

  4. 07-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 160/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The appellate court allowed the application for suspension of sentence in Criminal Appeal No. 160 of 2026 against Dhanabhai Shamalbhai Chenva. The court exercised discretion under Section 430 of B.N.S.S. to suspend the conviction sentence, as the parties had reached a compromise and the complainant's grievances were redressed. The convict was granted enlargement on bail subject to furnishing a surety of Rs. 5,000 and personal bond of the same amount, with conditions to remain present in court during the appeal proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case