DHANABHAI SHAMALBHAI CHENVA vs PUJAN FINANCE PVT. LTD., AUTHO. PERSON PRAJAPATI TARUNKUMAR JAYANTIBHAI Advocate - N R MIR — 160/2026

Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 415,. Status: LOK ADALAT. Next hearing: 09th May 2026.

CR A - CRIMINAL APPEAL

CNR: GJSK010006392026

LOK ADALAT

Next Hearing

09th May 2026

e-Filing Number

-

Filing Number

160/2026

Filing Date

07-03-2026

Registration No

160/2026

Registration Date

07-03-2026

Court

DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT HIMATNAGAR

Judge

1-PRINCIPAL DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE

Acts & Sections

Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 415,
NEGOTIABLE INSTRUMENTS ACT, 1881 Section 138,

Petitioner(s)

DHANABHAI SHAMALBHAI CHENVA

Adv. K J KUMPAVAT

Respondent(s)

PUJAN FINANCE PVT. LTD., AUTHO. PERSON PRAJAPATI TARUNKUMAR JAYANTIBHAI Advocate - N R MIR

THE STATE OF GUJARAT

Hearing History

Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL DISTRICT & SESSIONS JUDGE

07-03-2026

LOK ADALAT

Interim Orders

07-03-2026
ORDER

Summary: The appellate court allowed the application for suspension of sentence in Criminal Appeal No. 160 of 2026 against Dhanabhai Shamalbhai Chenva. The court exercised discretion under Section 430 of B.N.S.S. to suspend the conviction sentence, as the parties had reached a compromise and the complainant's grievances were redressed. The convict was granted enlargement on bail subject to furnishing a surety of Rs. 5,000 and personal bond of the same amount, with conditions to remain present in court during the appeal proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The appellate court allowed the application for suspension of sentence in Criminal Appeal No. 160 of 2026 against Dhanabhai Shamalbhai Chenva. The court exercised discretion under Section 430 of B.N.S.S. to suspend the conviction sentence, as the parties had reached a compromise and the complainant's grievances were redressed. The convict was granted enlargement on bail subject to furnishing a surety of Rs. 5,000 and personal bond of the same amount, with conditions to remain present in court during the appeal proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT HIMATNAGAR All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case