RANJITSINH NAHARSINH SOLANKI vs THE STATE OF GUJARAT Advocate - H V TRIVEDI — 223/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483(1)B. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 16th March 2026.
CRMA S - CRIMINAL MISC APPLI - SESSIONS
CNR: GJSK010005022026
Filing Number
223/2026
Filing Date
23-Feb-2026
Registration No
223/2026
Registration Date
23-Feb-2026
Court
DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT HIMATNAGAR
Judge
2-Addl. District Judge
Decision Date
16-Mar-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED
Last updated 12-Apr-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
832
Police Station
Himmatnagar Town A Division Police Station
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.RANJITSINH NAHARSINH SOLANKI
Adv. C P PATEL
Respondent(s)
-
1.THE STATE OF GUJARAT Advocate - H V TRIVEDI
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
16-Mar-2026
JudgmentView PDF
Summary The court partially allowed the accused's petition to modify bail conditions imposed under Section 2(d) of the Indian Penal Code. The key modification permitted was changing Condition 6, which previously restricted the accused from leaving Gujarat without court permission, to now allow travel within India. The court reasoned that since the accused has maintained compliance with all bail conditions and the investigation has progressed without hindrance, the restrictive condition warranting an outright ban on leaving the state could be relaxed while maintaining judicial oversight over the case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
16-Mar-2026
Disposed
Addl. District Judge
-
10-Mar-2026
Process To Respondents
Addl. District Judge
-
07-Mar-2026
Process To Respondents
Addl. District Judge
-
03-Mar-2026
Process To Respondents
Addl. District Judge
-
28-Feb-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
23-Feb-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 223/2026
Summary The court partially allowed the accused's petition to modify bail conditions imposed under Section 2(d) of the Indian Penal Code. The key modification permitted was changing Condition 6, which previously restricted the accused from leaving Gujarat without court permission, to now allow travel within India. The court reasoned that since the accused has maintained compliance with all bail conditions and the investigation has progressed without hindrance, the restrictive condition warranting an outright ban on leaving the state could be relaxed while maintaining judicial oversight over the case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts