RANJITSINH NAHARSINH SOLANKI vs THE STATE OF GUJARAT Advocate - H V TRIVEDI — 223/2026
Case under Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita Section 483(1)B,. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 16th March 2026.
CRMA S - CRIMINAL MISC APPLI - SESSIONS
CNR: GJSK010005022026
e-Filing Number
-
Filing Number
223/2026
Filing Date
23-02-2026
Registration No
223/2026
Registration Date
23-02-2026
Court
DISTRICT AND SESSIONS COURT HIMATNAGAR
Judge
2-ADDL. DISTRICT JUDGE
Decision Date
16th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED
FIR Details
FIR Number
832
Police Station
Himmatnagar Town A Division Police Station
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
RANJITSINH NAHARSINH SOLANKI
Adv. C P PATEL
Respondent(s)
THE STATE OF GUJARAT Advocate - H V TRIVEDI
Hearing History
Judge: 2-ADDL. DISTRICT JUDGE
Disposed
PROCESS TO RESPONDENTS
PROCESS TO RESPONDENTS
PROCESS TO RESPONDENTS
PROCESS TO RESPONDENTS
| Date | Purpose | Result |
|---|---|---|
| 16-03-2026 | Disposed | |
| 10-03-2026 | PROCESS TO RESPONDENTS | |
| 07-03-2026 | PROCESS TO RESPONDENTS | |
| 03-03-2026 | PROCESS TO RESPONDENTS | |
| 28-02-2026 | PROCESS TO RESPONDENTS |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary The court partially allowed the accused's petition to modify bail conditions imposed under Section 2(d) of the Indian Penal Code. The key modification permitted was changing Condition 6, which previously restricted the accused from leaving Gujarat without court permission, to now allow travel within India. The court reasoned that since the accused has maintained compliance with all bail conditions and the investigation has progressed without hindrance, the restrictive condition warranting an outright ban on leaving the state could be relaxed while maintaining judicial oversight over the case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The court partially allowed the accused's petition to modify bail conditions imposed under Section 2(d) of the Indian Penal Code. The key modification permitted was changing Condition 6, which previously restricted the accused from leaving Gujarat without court permission, to now allow travel within India. The court reasoned that since the accused has maintained compliance with all bail conditions and the investigation has progressed without hindrance, the restrictive condition warranting an outright ban on leaving the state could be relaxed while maintaining judicial oversight over the case. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts