Government of Gujarat vs DIPUBHAI GULABBHAI SHEKHALIYA Advocate - B R Rathod — 217/2025
Case under The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 Section 303,62,125,54. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 12th March 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJRJ270002952025
Filing Number
217/2025
Filing Date
21-07-2025
Registration No
217/2025
Registration Date
21-07-2025
Court
TALUKA COURT, VINCHHIYA
Judge
1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
12th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL
FIR Details
FIR Number
11213068240367
Police Station
VINCHHIYA POLICE STATION - RAJKOT DISTRICT
Year
2024
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Government of Gujarat
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
DIPUBHAI GULABBHAI SHEKHALIYA Advocate - B R Rathod
JAYSUKHBHAI LAXMANBHAI SHEKHALIYA
Adv. V A MARU
Hearing History
Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C
Disposed
FINAL ARGUMENTS
FINAL ARGUMENTS
FINAL ARGUMENTS
FINAL ARGUMENTS
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 12-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 11-03-2026 | FINAL ARGUMENTS |
| 02-03-2026 | FINAL ARGUMENTS |
| 11-02-2026 | FINAL ARGUMENTS |
| 29-01-2026 | FINAL ARGUMENTS |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary The court acquitted both accused (Deepubhai Gulabbhai Shekhlia and Jaysukbbhai Lakshmanbbhai Shekhlia) of charges under BNS Sections 303, 62, 125, and 54, finding insufficient evidence that they committed theft of a transformer and wire from a PGVCL company property on October 6, 2024. The prosecution failed to establish the essential elements of the theft offense, particularly failing to prove direct culpability or intent through credible witness testimony. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Interim Orders
Summary The court acquitted both accused (Deepubhai Gulabbhai Shekhlia and Jaysukbbhai Lakshmanbbhai Shekhlia) of charges under BNS Sections 303, 62, 125, and 54, finding insufficient evidence that they committed theft of a transformer and wire from a PGVCL company property on October 6, 2024. The prosecution failed to establish the essential elements of the theft offense, particularly failing to prove direct culpability or intent through credible witness testimony. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts