Government of Gujarat vs RUKHADBHAI POLABHAI KALOTRA Advocate - B R Rathod — 109/2026
Case under The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 Section 285. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 21st April 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJRJ270001522026
Filing Number
109/2026
Filing Date
11-Mar-2026
Registration No
109/2026
Registration Date
11-Mar-2026
Court
TALUKA COURT, VINCHHIYA
Judge
1-Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
21-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL
Last updated 21-May-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
11213068260102
Police Station
VINCHHIYA POLICE STATION - RAJKOT DISTRICT
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Government of Gujarat
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
-
1.RUKHADBHAI POLABHAI KALOTRA Advocate - B R Rathod
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
21-Apr-2026
JudegementView PDF
Case Summary The court acquitted the accused, Rukh/Bhai Polabhai Kalotara, of charges under IPC Section 285 (2023) for allegedly leaving his vehicle on a public road in a manner likely to cause danger to traffic and pedestrians on February 16, 2026. The prosecution failed to establish the offense beyond reasonable doubt, as the witness testimonies were contradictory and lacked corroboration from independent evidence, necessitating acquittal in the accused's favor. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
21-Apr-2026
Disposed
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
07-Apr-2026
Final Arguments
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
04-Apr-2026
Further Statement
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
24-Mar-2026
Further Statement
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
11-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
11-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 109/2026
Case Summary The court acquitted the accused, Rukh/Bhai Polabhai Kalotara, of charges under IPC Section 285 (2023) for allegedly leaving his vehicle on a public road in a manner likely to cause danger to traffic and pedestrians on February 16, 2026. The prosecution failed to establish the offense beyond reasonable doubt, as the witness testimonies were contradictory and lacked corroboration from independent evidence, necessitating acquittal in the accused's favor. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts