Government of Gujarat vs KISHORBHAI AAPABHAI CHOVASIYA Advocate - B R Rathod — 108/2026
Case under The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 Section 223. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 21st April 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJRJ270001512026
Filing Number
108/2026
Filing Date
11-Mar-2026
Registration No
108/2026
Registration Date
11-Mar-2026
Court
TALUKA COURT, VINCHHIYA
Judge
1-Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
21-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL
Last updated 21-May-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
11213068260069
Police Station
VINCHHIYA POLICE STATION - RAJKOT DISTRICT
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Government of Gujarat
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
-
1.KISHORBHAI AAPABHAI CHOVASIYA Advocate - B R Rathod
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
21-Apr-2026
JudegementView PDF
Summary The court acquitted the defendant Kishorabhdi Apaabhdi Chovsiya of charges under Section 223 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita 2023 (disobedience of government orders). The judge found that the prosecution failed to prove beyond reasonable doubt that the defendant violated the district magistrate's public notice by not installing CCTV cameras at his scrap yard ("Momaye Ma"). The court determined the prosecution's witnesses and evidence were insufficient to establish the charge, and therefore acquitted the defendant in absentia on April 21, 2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
21-Apr-2026
Disposed
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
07-Apr-2026
Final Arguments
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
04-Apr-2026
Further Statement
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
24-Mar-2026
Further Statement
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
11-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
11-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 108/2026
Summary The court acquitted the defendant Kishorabhdi Apaabhdi Chovsiya of charges under Section 223 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita 2023 (disobedience of government orders). The judge found that the prosecution failed to prove beyond reasonable doubt that the defendant violated the district magistrate's public notice by not installing CCTV cameras at his scrap yard ("Momaye Ma"). The court determined the prosecution's witnesses and evidence were insufficient to establish the charge, and therefore acquitted the defendant in absentia on April 21, 2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts