Government of Gujarat vs RAJUBHAI RAMESHBHAI KATESIYA Advocate - B R Rathod — 104/2026

Case under The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 Section 285. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 30th April 2026.

CC - CRIMINAL CASE

CNR: GJRJ270001472026

Case disposed

e-Filing Number

02-03-2026

Filing Number

104/2026

Filing Date

11-03-2026

Registration No

104/2026

Registration Date

11-03-2026

Court

TALUKA COURT, VINCHHIYA

Judge

1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C

Decision Date

30th April 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL

FIR Details

FIR Number

27

Police Station

VINCHHIYA POLICE STATION - RAJKOT DISTRICT

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

THE BHARATIYA NYAYA SANHITA, 2023 Section 285

Petitioner(s)

Government of Gujarat

Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

RAJUBHAI RAMESHBHAI KATESIYA Advocate - B R Rathod

Hearing History

Judge: 1-PRINCIPAL CIVIL JUDGE & J.M.F.C

30-04-2026

Disposed

20-04-2026

FINAL ARGUMENTS

10-04-2026

FURTHER STATEMENT

04-04-2026

EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION

24-03-2026

EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION

Final Orders / Judgements

30-04-2026
JUDEGEMENT

Summary The court acquitted the defendant Rajubhai Rameshbhai Kataria of charges under Section 285 of the Indian Penal Code (2023), finding that the prosecution failed to prove beyond reasonable doubt that the defendant intentionally placed his auto-rickshaw on a public road in a manner that caused obstruction to traffic and pedestrians. The court noted significant credibility issues with prosecution witnesses' testimony and insufficient corroborating evidence, concluding that the complainant had not established the essential elements of the offense through credible and independent evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The court acquitted the defendant Rajubhai Rameshbhai Kataria of charges under Section 285 of the Indian Penal Code (2023), finding that the prosecution failed to prove beyond reasonable doubt that the defendant intentionally placed his auto-rickshaw on a public road in a manner that caused obstruction to traffic and pedestrians. The court noted significant credibility issues with prosecution witnesses' testimony and insufficient corroborating evidence, concluding that the complainant had not established the essential elements of the offense through credible and independent evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

TALUKA COURT, VINCHHIYA All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case