Government of Gujarat vs RAJUBHAI RAMESHBHAI KATESIYA Advocate - B R Rathod — 104/2026
Case under The Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 Section 285. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 30th April 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJRJ270001472026
e-Filing Number
02-03-2026
Filing Number
104/2026
Filing Date
11-Mar-2026
Registration No
104/2026
Registration Date
11-Mar-2026
Court
TALUKA COURT, VINCHHIYA
Judge
1-Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
30-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL
Last updated 16-May-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
27
Police Station
VINCHHIYA POLICE STATION - RAJKOT DISTRICT
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Government of Gujarat
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
-
1.RAJUBHAI RAMESHBHAI KATESIYA Advocate - B R Rathod
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
30-Apr-2026
JudegementView PDF
Summary The court acquitted the defendant Rajubhai Rameshbhai Kataria of charges under Section 285 of the Indian Penal Code (2023), finding that the prosecution failed to prove beyond reasonable doubt that the defendant intentionally placed his auto-rickshaw on a public road in a manner that caused obstruction to traffic and pedestrians. The court noted significant credibility issues with prosecution witnesses' testimony and insufficient corroborating evidence, concluding that the complainant had not established the essential elements of the offense through credible and independent evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
30-Apr-2026
Disposed
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
20-Apr-2026
Final Arguments
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
10-Apr-2026
Further Statement
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
04-Apr-2026
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
24-Mar-2026
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
11-Mar-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
11-Mar-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 104/2026
Summary The court acquitted the defendant Rajubhai Rameshbhai Kataria of charges under Section 285 of the Indian Penal Code (2023), finding that the prosecution failed to prove beyond reasonable doubt that the defendant intentionally placed his auto-rickshaw on a public road in a manner that caused obstruction to traffic and pedestrians. The court noted significant credibility issues with prosecution witnesses' testimony and insufficient corroborating evidence, concluding that the complainant had not established the essential elements of the offense through credible and independent evidence. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts