Government of Gujarat vs VISHALBHAI VINUBHAI HADA Advocate - B R Rathod — 91/2026
Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65AA. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 09th April 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJRJ270001192026
Filing Number
91/2026
Filing Date
19-Feb-2026
Registration No
91/2026
Registration Date
19-Feb-2026
Court
TALUKA COURT, VINCHHIYA
Judge
1-Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
09-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL
Last updated 16-May-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
11213068250132
Police Station
VINCHHIYA POLICE STATION - RAJKOT DISTRICT
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Government of Gujarat
Respondent(s)
-
1.VISHALBHAI VINUBHAI HADA Advocate - B R Rathod
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
09-Apr-2026
JudegementView PDF
Court Decision Summary The court acquitted the accused Vishalbhai Vinubhai Handa of charges under Section 65(A,A) of the Gujarat Prohibition Act for allegedly possessing 1 liter of country liquor valued at ₹200 on 12/04/2025. The court found that the prosecution failed to conclusively prove the case beyond reasonable doubt, as the testimonies of the witnesses (particularly the panch witnesses) contained inconsistencies and lacked sufficient corroboration, thereby granting the benefit of doubt to the accused. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
09-Apr-2026
Disposed
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
18-Mar-2026
Final Arguments
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
11-Mar-2026
Further Statement
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
19-Feb-2026
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
19-Feb-2026
Case filed
Registration No. 91/2026
Court Decision Summary The court acquitted the accused Vishalbhai Vinubhai Handa of charges under Section 65(A,A) of the Gujarat Prohibition Act for allegedly possessing 1 liter of country liquor valued at ₹200 on 12/04/2025. The court found that the prosecution failed to conclusively prove the case beyond reasonable doubt, as the testimonies of the witnesses (particularly the panch witnesses) contained inconsistencies and lacked sufficient corroboration, thereby granting the benefit of doubt to the accused. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts