CHIRAG NARESHBHAI CHANDRAVADIYA vs THE STATE OF GUJARAT Advocate - AGP — 89/2026

Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 483. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 11th March 2026.

Case disposed

CRMA S - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION - SESSIONS

CNR: GJRJ220002092026

Filing Number

89/2026

Filing Date

10-Mar-2026

Registration No

89/2026

Registration Date

10-Mar-2026

Court

FTC COURT, DHORAJI

Judge

1-3rd Addl District Judge

Decision Date

11-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Last updated 16-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

11213064250818

Police Station

UPLETA POLICE STATION - RAJKOT DISTRICT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 483

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.CHIRAG NARESHBHAI CHANDRAVADIYA

    Adv. B A JUNEJA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF GUJARAT Advocate - AGP

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 11-Mar-2026

    JudegementView PDF

    Case Summary The Third Additional Sessions Court at Dhoraji, Rajkot, granted regular bail to Chirag Nareshbhai Chandravadiya in FIR No. 112130642508181825 registered under BNS Sections 108, 3(5), 336(3), 338, 340(2), and 61(2). The court found that the accused's role was substantially similar to another co-accused (Mehul) who had already been granted bail by the Gujarat High Court, making it appropriate to extend similar relief on parity grounds. The bail was granted on a bond of Rs. 20,000 with conditions including non-interference with the complainant's case, remaining within Gujarat state boundaries, and furnishing a permanent address to the court. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 11-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    3rd Addl District Judge

  4. 10-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 89/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary The Third Additional Sessions Court at Dhoraji, Rajkot, granted regular bail to Chirag Nareshbhai Chandravadiya in FIR No. 112130642508181825 registered under BNS Sections 108, 3(5), 336(3), 338, 340(2), and 61(2). The court found that the accused's role was substantially similar to another co-accused (Mehul) who had already been granted bail by the Gujarat High Court, making it appropriate to extend similar relief on parity grounds. The bail was granted on a bond of Rs. 20,000 with conditions including non-interference with the complainant's case, remaining within Gujarat state boundaries, and furnishing a permanent address to the court. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case