HIRABHAI JIVABHAI MORI vs THE STATE OF GUJARAT Advocate - AGP — 88/2026

Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 483. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 13th March 2026.

Case disposed

CRMA S - CRIMINAL MISC. APPLICATION - SESSIONS

CNR: GJRJ220002082026

Filing Number

88/2026

Filing Date

10-Mar-2026

Registration No

88/2026

Registration Date

10-Mar-2026

Court

FTC COURT, DHORAJI

Judge

1-3rd Addl District Judge

Decision Date

13-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Last updated 16-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

11213020250543

Police Station

JAMKANDORANA POLICE STATION - RAJKOT DISTRICT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 483

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.HIRABHAI JIVABHAI MORI

    Adv. N R SHEKHVA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE STATE OF GUJARAT Advocate - AGP

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 13-Mar-2026

    JudegementView PDF

    Summary The Additional Sessions Court at Dhoraji, Rajkot granted regular bail to the accused in a Prohibition Act case (Sections 65(a), 65(b), 116(b), 83, 81, 98) after the chargesheet was filed. The court found that the accused is a local resident with immovable property, poses no flight risk, and considered similar bail grants to co-accused and precedent cases, thereby approving bail of ₹20,000 with sureties and specific conditions including non-interference with witnesses and restriction on leaving Gujarat without court permission. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 13-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    3rd Addl District Judge

  4. 12-Mar-2026

    Order

    3rd Addl District Judge

  5. 11-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 10-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 88/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Additional Sessions Court at Dhoraji, Rajkot granted regular bail to the accused in a Prohibition Act case (Sections 65(a), 65(b), 116(b), 83, 81, 98) after the chargesheet was filed. The court found that the accused is a local resident with immovable property, poses no flight risk, and considered similar bail grants to co-accused and precedent cases, thereby approving bail of ₹20,000 with sureties and specific conditions including non-interference with witnesses and restriction on leaving Gujarat without court permission. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case