YUNUSH AHMAD MYANUR vs THE STATE OF GUJARAT Advocate - APP — 31/2025

Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 415. Disposed: Uncontested--LOK ADALAT on 14th March 2026.

Case disposed

CR A - CRIMINAL APPEAL

CNR: GJRJ210007152025

Filing Number

31/2025

Filing Date

14-Nov-2025

Registration No

31/2025

Registration Date

14-Nov-2025

Court

FTC COURT, JETPUR

Judge

1-7th Addl District Judge

Decision Date

14-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Uncontested--LOK ADALAT

Last updated 16-May-2026

Acts & Sections

The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 415

Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Section 138

Petitioner(s)

1.YUNUSH AHMAD MYANUR

Adv. J G VAGHELA

Respondent(s)

1.THE STATE OF GUJARAT Advocate - APP (Assistant Public Prosecutor)
2.OWNER OF PUJA FINANCE YOGESHBHAI ANANTRAI GANDHI

Adv. P C APARNATHI

Case History

Case disposedDisposed
14-Mar-2026

OrderView PDF

The court allowed the criminal appeal and quashed the conviction under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instrument Act after the parties reached an amicable settlement in National Lok Adalat. The appellant was acquitted, costs were waived, and any court-deposited amount was ordered to be paid to the complainant, recognizing the parties' positive settlement efforts. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
14-Mar-2026

Disposed

7th Addl District Judge
13-Mar-2026

For R&P

7th Addl District Judge
11-Mar-2026

For R&P

7th Addl District Judge
11-Feb-2026

For R&P

7th Addl District Judge
09-Feb-2026

For R&P

7th Addl District Judge
22-Jan-2026

For R&P

8th Addl District Judge
30-Dec-2025

First hearing

Initial hearing scheduled
14-Nov-2025

Case filed

Registration No. 31/2025

casestatus.in Summary

The court allowed the criminal appeal and quashed the conviction under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instrument Act after the parties reached an amicable settlement in National Lok Adalat. The appellant was acquitted, costs were waived, and any court-deposited amount was ordered to be paid to the complainant, recognizing the parties' positive settlement efforts. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.