Government of Gujarat vs HIREN @ HIRAKO BHARATBHAI ZIJVADIYA Advocate - N B PANDYA — 14/2024
Case under Indian Penal Code Section 379(A)3,114. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 27th March 2026.
SC - SESSIONS CASE
CNR: GJRJ210006922024
Filing Number
14/2024
Filing Date
05-12-2024
Registration No
14/2024
Registration Date
05-12-2024
Court
FTC COURT, JETPUR
Judge
1-6th ADDL DISTRICT JUDGE
Decision Date
27th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL
FIR Details
FIR Number
11213022210061
Police Station
JETPUR CITY POLICE STATION - RAJKOT DISTRICT
Year
2021
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Government of Gujarat
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
HIREN @ HIRAKO BHARATBHAI ZIJVADIYA Advocate - N B PANDYA
PRATAPBHAI @ PADU DEVKUBHAI BASIYA
Adv. N B PANDYA
VIRPAL @ VIRAPAN VIRKUBHAI DEREYA
Adv. N B PANDYA
Hearing History
Judge: 1-6th ADDL DISTRICT JUDGE
Disposed
FURTHER STATEMENT
EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION
EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION
FRAMING OF CHARGE
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 27-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 18-03-2026 | FURTHER STATEMENT |
| 11-03-2026 | EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION |
| 26-02-2026 | EVIDENCE OF PROSECUTION |
| 28-01-2026 | FRAMING OF CHARGE |
Final Orders / Judgements
The court acquitted all three accused (Hiren, Pratapbhai, and Virpal) of charges under IPC Sections 379(a)(3) and 114 for allegedly stealing a mobile phone worth ₹7,000 on January 7, 2021, finding insufficient evidence to prove the case beyond reasonable doubt. The prosecution failed to establish a convincing link between the accused and the crime through witness testimony and documentary evidence, leading to their discharge under CrPC Section 235(1). This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
The court acquitted all three accused (Hiren, Pratapbhai, and Virpal) of charges under IPC Sections 379(a)(3) and 114 for allegedly stealing a mobile phone worth ₹7,000 on January 7, 2021, finding insufficient evidence to prove the case beyond reasonable doubt. The prosecution failed to establish a convincing link between the accused and the crime through witness testimony and documentary evidence, leading to their discharge under CrPC Section 235(1). This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts