Government of Gujarat vs HIREN @ HIRAKO BHARATBHAI ZIJVADIYA Advocate - N B PANDYA — 14/2024

Case under Indian Penal Code Section 379(A)3,114. Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 27th March 2026.

Case disposed

SC - SESSIONS CASE

CNR: GJRJ210006922024

Filing Number

14/2024

Filing Date

05-Dec-2024

Registration No

14/2024

Registration Date

05-Dec-2024

Court

FTC COURT, JETPUR

Judge

1-6th Addl District Judge

Decision Date

27-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL

Last updated 16-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

11213022210061

Police Station

JETPUR CITY POLICE STATION - RAJKOT DISTRICT

Year

2021

Acts & Sections

Indian Penal Code Section 379(A)3,114

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Government of Gujarat

    Adv. APP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.HIREN @ HIRAKO BHARATBHAI ZIJVADIYA Advocate - N B PANDYA

  2. 2.PRATAPBHAI @ PADU DEVKUBHAI BASIYA

    Adv. N B PANDYA

  3. 3.VIRPAL @ VIRAPAN VIRKUBHAI DEREYA

    Adv. N B PANDYA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 27-Mar-2026

    JudegementView PDF

    The court acquitted all three accused (Hiren, Pratapbhai, and Virpal) of charges under IPC Sections 379(a)(3) and 114 for allegedly stealing a mobile phone worth ₹7,000 on January 7, 2021, finding insufficient evidence to prove the case beyond reasonable doubt. The prosecution failed to establish a convincing link between the accused and the crime through witness testimony and documentary evidence, leading to their discharge under CrPC Section 235(1). This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 27-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    6th Addl District Judge

  4. 18-Mar-2026

    Further Statement

    6th Addl District Judge

  5. 11-Mar-2026

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    7th Addl District Judge

  6. 26-Feb-2026

    Evidence Of Prosecution

    7th Addl District Judge

  7. 28-Jan-2026

    Framing Of Charge

    8th Addl District Judge

  8. 16-Jan-2026

    Framing Of Charge

    8th Addl District Judge

  9. 08-Jan-2026

    Framing Of Charge

    8th Addl District Judge

  10. 30-Dec-2025

    Framing Of Charge

    9th Addl District Judge

  11. 17-Dec-2025

    Framing Of Charge

    9th Addl District Judge

  12. 17-Nov-2025

    Documentary Evidence

    5th Addl District Judge

  13. 13-Oct-2025

    Documentary Evidence

    5th Addl District Judge

  14. 09-Sep-2025

    Documentary Evidence

    5th Addl District Judge

  15. 05-Aug-2025

    Documentary Evidence

    Addl. District Judge

  16. 15-Jul-2025

    Documentary Evidence

    Addl. District Judge

  17. 18-Jun-2025

    Documentary Evidence

    Addl. District Judge

  18. 07-May-2025

    Documentary Evidence

    Addl. District Judge

  19. 09-Apr-2025

    Documentary Evidence

    Addl. District Judge

  20. 19-Mar-2025

    Documentary Evidence

    Addl. District Judge

  21. 25-Feb-2025

    Documentary Evidence

    Addl. District Judge

  22. 04-Feb-2025

    Documentary Evidence

    Addl. District Judge

  23. 20-Jan-2025

    Documentary Evidence

    Addl. District Judge

  24. 01-Jan-2025

    Documentary Evidence

    Addl. District Judge

  25. 19-Dec-2024

    Documentary Evidence

    Addl. District Judge

  26. 05-Dec-2024

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  27. 05-Dec-2024

    Case filed

    Registration No. 14/2024

casestatus.in Summary

The court acquitted all three accused (Hiren, Pratapbhai, and Virpal) of charges under IPC Sections 379(a)(3) and 114 for allegedly stealing a mobile phone worth ₹7,000 on January 7, 2021, finding insufficient evidence to prove the case beyond reasonable doubt. The prosecution failed to establish a convincing link between the accused and the crime through witness testimony and documentary evidence, leading to their discharge under CrPC Section 235(1). This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case