Ashwinbhai Vinubhai Vegda vs The State of Gujarat Advocate - APP — 94/2026

Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 483. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 11th March 2026.

CRMA S - CRI. MISC. APPLI. - SESSIONS

CNR: GJRJ210001742026

Case disposed

Filing Number

94/2026

Filing Date

07-03-2026

Registration No

94/2026

Registration Date

07-03-2026

Court

FTC COURT, JETPUR

Judge

1-7th ADDL DISTRICT JUDGE

Decision Date

11th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

FIR Details

FIR Number

11213096260155

Police Station

JETPUR UDHYOG NAGAR POLICE STATION - RAJKOT DISTRICT

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

THE BHARATIYA NAGARIK SURAKSHA SANHITA, 2023 Section 483

Petitioner(s)

Ashwinbhai Vinubhai Vegda

Adv. N B PANDYA

Respondent(s)

The State of Gujarat Advocate - APP (Assistant Public Prosecutor)

Hearing History

Judge: 1-7th ADDL DISTRICT JUDGE

11-03-2026

Disposed

Final Orders / Judgements

11-03-2026
ORDER

Court Decision Summary The Additional Sessions Court in Rajkot granted conditional regular bail to Ashvinbhai Vinubhai Vegda under Section 483 BNSS in a criminal case involving charges under IPC Sections 109, 126(2), 115(2), and NDPS Act Section 66(1)(b). The court found that while serious charges were leveled, the alleged victim received only minor injuries requiring one-day hospitalization with normal treatment and immediate discharge, and considering the applicant's local roots, lack of serious injury evidence, and that prior convictions alone cannot justify bail denial, conditional bail was warranted with restrictions including non-contact with complainant, remaining within Gujarat, and deposit of Rs. 20,000 security. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Court Decision Summary The Additional Sessions Court in Rajkot granted conditional regular bail to Ashvinbhai Vinubhai Vegda under Section 483 BNSS in a criminal case involving charges under IPC Sections 109, 126(2), 115(2), and NDPS Act Section 66(1)(b). The court found that while serious charges were leveled, the alleged victim received only minor injuries requiring one-day hospitalization with normal treatment and immediate discharge, and considering the applicant's local roots, lack of serious injury evidence, and that prior convictions alone cannot justify bail denial, conditional bail was warranted with restrictions including non-contact with complainant, remaining within Gujarat, and deposit of Rs. 20,000 security. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

FTC COURT, JETPUR All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case