Ashwinbhai Vinubhai Vegda vs The State of Gujarat Advocate - APP — 94/2026
Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 483. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 11th March 2026.
CRMA S - CRI. MISC. APPLI. - SESSIONS
CNR: GJRJ210001742026
Filing Number
94/2026
Filing Date
07-03-2026
Registration No
94/2026
Registration Date
07-03-2026
Court
FTC COURT, JETPUR
Judge
1-7th ADDL DISTRICT JUDGE
Decision Date
11th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--ALLOWED
FIR Details
FIR Number
11213096260155
Police Station
JETPUR UDHYOG NAGAR POLICE STATION - RAJKOT DISTRICT
Year
2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Ashwinbhai Vinubhai Vegda
Adv. N B PANDYA
Respondent(s)
The State of Gujarat Advocate - APP (Assistant Public Prosecutor)
Hearing History
Judge: 1-7th ADDL DISTRICT JUDGE
Disposed
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 11-03-2026 | Disposed |
Final Orders / Judgements
Court Decision Summary The Additional Sessions Court in Rajkot granted conditional regular bail to Ashvinbhai Vinubhai Vegda under Section 483 BNSS in a criminal case involving charges under IPC Sections 109, 126(2), 115(2), and NDPS Act Section 66(1)(b). The court found that while serious charges were leveled, the alleged victim received only minor injuries requiring one-day hospitalization with normal treatment and immediate discharge, and considering the applicant's local roots, lack of serious injury evidence, and that prior convictions alone cannot justify bail denial, conditional bail was warranted with restrictions including non-contact with complainant, remaining within Gujarat, and deposit of Rs. 20,000 security. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Court Decision Summary The Additional Sessions Court in Rajkot granted conditional regular bail to Ashvinbhai Vinubhai Vegda under Section 483 BNSS in a criminal case involving charges under IPC Sections 109, 126(2), 115(2), and NDPS Act Section 66(1)(b). The court found that while serious charges were leveled, the alleged victim received only minor injuries requiring one-day hospitalization with normal treatment and immediate discharge, and considering the applicant's local roots, lack of serious injury evidence, and that prior convictions alone cannot justify bail denial, conditional bail was warranted with restrictions including non-contact with complainant, remaining within Gujarat, and deposit of Rs. 20,000 security. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts