Keval Jentibhai Sitapara vs The State of Gujarat Advocate - APP — 92/2026
Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 483. Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 12th March 2026.
CRMA S - CRI. MISC. APPLI. - SESSIONS
CNR: GJRJ210001722026
Filing Number
92/2026
Filing Date
07-03-2026
Registration No
92/2026
Registration Date
07-03-2026
Court
FTC COURT, JETPUR
Judge
1-7th ADDL DISTRICT JUDGE
Decision Date
12th March 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--REJECTED
FIR Details
FIR Number
11213022250775
Police Station
JETPUR CITY POLICE STATION - RAJKOT DISTRICT
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
Keval Jentibhai Sitapara
Adv. D M VAGHELA
Respondent(s)
The State of Gujarat Advocate - APP (Assistant Public Prosecutor)
Hearing History
Judge: 1-7th ADDL DISTRICT JUDGE
Disposed
HEARING
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 12-03-2026 | Disposed |
| 11-03-2026 | HEARING |
Final Orders / Judgements
Court Decision Summary The Additional Sessions Court, Rajkot rejected the regular bail application of Keval Jentibhai Sitapara under BNS Section 483. The applicant was accused of cyber fraud offenses under BNS Sections 316(5), 318(4), 61(2), 54, and 317(2). The court found that the accused had allegedly used bank accounts of others to receive and transfer fraudulently obtained funds amounting to approximately ₹94,89,077 to Dubai, and had a pattern of committing similar crimes across multiple police stations, making him unsuitable for bail at this stage. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Court Decision Summary The Additional Sessions Court, Rajkot rejected the regular bail application of Keval Jentibhai Sitapara under BNS Section 483. The applicant was accused of cyber fraud offenses under BNS Sections 316(5), 318(4), 61(2), 54, and 317(2). The court found that the accused had allegedly used bank accounts of others to receive and transfer fraudulently obtained funds amounting to approximately ₹94,89,077 to Dubai, and had a pattern of committing similar crimes across multiple police stations, making him unsuitable for bail at this stage. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts