Harshadbhai Hemrajbhai Desai vs The State of Gujarat Advocate - APP — 90/2026

Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 483. Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 12th March 2026.

Case disposed

CRMA S - CRI. MISC. APPLI. - SESSIONS

CNR: GJRJ210001692026

Filing Number

90/2026

Filing Date

06-Mar-2026

Registration No

90/2026

Registration Date

06-Mar-2026

Court

FTC COURT, JETPUR

Judge

1-7th Addl District Judge

Decision Date

12-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--REJECTED

Last updated 16-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

11213001250477

Police Station

VIRPUR POLICE STATION - RAJKOT DISTRICT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 483

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Harshadbhai Hemrajbhai Desai

    Adv. B P TRIVEDI

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.The State of Gujarat Advocate - APP (Assistant Public Prosecutor)

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 12-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    Court Decision Summary The Additional Sessions Court, Rajkot rejected the regular bail application of Harshdbhai Hemrajbhai Desai under Section 483 of BNSS. The court found substantial evidence linking the applicant to a cyber fraud conspiracy involving fraudulent transfer of Rs. 94,89,077/-, and noted he had a similar ongoing case with Rs. 94,89,077/- in fraud amounts, indicating a pattern of repeated offenses. The court held that granting bail would risk further crimes and obstruct justice, making him unsuitable for release on bail at this stage. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 12-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    7th Addl District Judge

  4. 11-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    7th Addl District Judge

  5. 10-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 06-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 90/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Court Decision Summary The Additional Sessions Court, Rajkot rejected the regular bail application of Harshdbhai Hemrajbhai Desai under Section 483 of BNSS. The court found substantial evidence linking the applicant to a cyber fraud conspiracy involving fraudulent transfer of Rs. 94,89,077/-, and noted he had a similar ongoing case with Rs. 94,89,077/- in fraud amounts, indicating a pattern of repeated offenses. The court held that granting bail would risk further crimes and obstruct justice, making him unsuitable for release on bail at this stage. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case