Harshadbhai Hemrajbhai Desai vs The State of Gujarat Advocate - APP — 90/2026

Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 483. Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 12th March 2026.

CRMA S - CRI. MISC. APPLI. - SESSIONS

CNR: GJRJ210001692026

Case disposed

Filing Number

90/2026

Filing Date

06-03-2026

Registration No

90/2026

Registration Date

06-03-2026

Court

FTC COURT, JETPUR

Judge

1-7th ADDL DISTRICT JUDGE

Decision Date

12th March 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--REJECTED

FIR Details

FIR Number

11213001250477

Police Station

VIRPUR POLICE STATION - RAJKOT DISTRICT

Year

2025

Acts & Sections

THE BHARATIYA NAGARIK SURAKSHA SANHITA, 2023 Section 483

Petitioner(s)

Harshadbhai Hemrajbhai Desai

Adv. B P TRIVEDI

Respondent(s)

The State of Gujarat Advocate - APP (Assistant Public Prosecutor)

Hearing History

Judge: 1-7th ADDL DISTRICT JUDGE

12-03-2026

Disposed

11-03-2026

HEARING

10-03-2026

HEARING

Final Orders / Judgements

12-03-2026
ORDER

Court Decision Summary The Additional Sessions Court, Rajkot rejected the regular bail application of Harshdbhai Hemrajbhai Desai under Section 483 of BNSS. The court found substantial evidence linking the applicant to a cyber fraud conspiracy involving fraudulent transfer of Rs. 94,89,077/-, and noted he had a similar ongoing case with Rs. 94,89,077/- in fraud amounts, indicating a pattern of repeated offenses. The court held that granting bail would risk further crimes and obstruct justice, making him unsuitable for release on bail at this stage. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Court Decision Summary The Additional Sessions Court, Rajkot rejected the regular bail application of Harshdbhai Hemrajbhai Desai under Section 483 of BNSS. The court found substantial evidence linking the applicant to a cyber fraud conspiracy involving fraudulent transfer of Rs. 94,89,077/-, and noted he had a similar ongoing case with Rs. 94,89,077/- in fraud amounts, indicating a pattern of repeated offenses. The court held that granting bail would risk further crimes and obstruct justice, making him unsuitable for release on bail at this stage. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

More from this court

FTC COURT, JETPUR All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case