Naushad Ishak Khan vs The State of Gujarat Advocate - APP — 87/2026

Case under The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 483. Disposed: Contested--REJECTED on 11th March 2026.

Case disposed

CRMA S - CRI. MISC. APPLI. - SESSIONS

CNR: GJRJ210001632026

Filing Number

87/2026

Filing Date

03-Mar-2026

Registration No

87/2026

Registration Date

03-Mar-2026

Court

FTC COURT, JETPUR

Judge

1-7th Addl District Judge

Decision Date

11-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--REJECTED

Last updated 16-May-2026

FIR Details

FIR Number

11213001260055

Police Station

VIRPUR POLICE STATION - RAJKOT DISTRICT

Year

2026

Acts & Sections

The Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 Section 483

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.Naushad Ishak Khan

    Adv. D M VAGHELA

  2. 2.Khalin Khursid Khan

    Adv. D M VAGHELA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.The State of Gujarat Advocate - APP (Assistant Public Prosecutor)

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 11-Mar-2026

    OrderView PDF

    Court Decision Summary The Additional Sessions Court in Jetpur, Rajkot rejected the regular bail application of two applicants (Naushadkhan and Khalilkhan) under BNSS Section 483, who were arrested for allegedly transporting liquor worth Rs. 51,90,240. The court found that given the serious nature of the offense, the large quantity of contraband seized, the applicants' direct involvement as the truck's driver and cleaner, and current trends of increasing such crimes, bail at this stage was not justified. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 11-Mar-2026

    Disposed

    7th Addl District Judge

  4. 10-Mar-2026

    Hearing

    7th Addl District Judge

  5. 07-Mar-2026

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  6. 03-Mar-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. 87/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Court Decision Summary The Additional Sessions Court in Jetpur, Rajkot rejected the regular bail application of two applicants (Naushadkhan and Khalilkhan) under BNSS Section 483, who were arrested for allegedly transporting liquor worth Rs. 51,90,240. The court found that given the serious nature of the offense, the large quantity of contraband seized, the applicants' direct involvement as the truck's driver and cleaner, and current trends of increasing such crimes, bail at this stage was not justified. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case