BACHUBHAI JIVABHAI vs MORBI NAGAR PALIKA Advocate - G K BHATT — 48/2024

Case under Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 Section 33C. Disposed: Contested--JUDGEMENT on 01st April 2026.

RECO33C2 LC - Recovery 33C (2)

CNR: GJRJ180004962024

Case disposed

Filing Number

48/2024

Filing Date

02-03-2024

Registration No

48/2024

Registration Date

02-03-2024

Court

LABOUR COURT, RAJKOT

Judge

2-JUDGE, LABOUR COURT

Decision Date

01st April 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--JUDGEMENT

Acts & Sections

INDUSTRIAL DISPUTES ACT, 1947 Section 33C

Petitioner(s)

BACHUBHAI JIVABHAI

Adv. DHIRUBHAI MAKWANA

Respondent(s)

MORBI NAGAR PALIKA Advocate - G K BHATT

Hearing History

Judge: 2-JUDGE, LABOUR COURT

01-04-2026

Disposed

11-03-2026

For Order

21-02-2026

For Arguement of opponent

16-02-2026

For Arguement of opponent

19-01-2026

For Evidence of opponent

Final Orders / Judgements

01-04-2026
JUDEGEMENT

Summary The Labour Court in Morabi held that the worker is entitled to recover Rs. 47,000 as unpaid dress allowance for the period 1995-2016 under Industrial Disputes Act 1947, Section 33(2), with additional 12% interest if payment is delayed beyond 30 days. The court rejected the municipal corporation's defense, finding that the worker had proven eligibility for the statutory benefit under municipal dress code regulations, and the municipality failed to provide any valid documentation to contradict the worker's claim. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Labour Court in Morabi held that the worker is entitled to recover Rs. 47,000 as unpaid dress allowance for the period 1995-2016 under Industrial Disputes Act 1947, Section 33(2), with additional 12% interest if payment is delayed beyond 30 days. The court rejected the municipal corporation's defense, finding that the worker had proven eligibility for the statutory benefit under municipal dress code regulations, and the municipality failed to provide any valid documentation to contradict the worker's claim. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

More from this court

LABOUR COURT, RAJKOT All courts →

Explore other courts

Search Another Case