GAURIBEN MOTIBHAI vs MORBI NAGAR PALIKA Advocate - G K BHATT — 54/2024
Case under Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 Section 33C. Disposed: Contested--JUDGEMENT on 01st April 2026.
RECO33C2 LC - Recovery 33C (2)
CNR: GJRJ180004902024
Filing Number
54/2024
Filing Date
02-03-2024
Registration No
54/2024
Registration Date
02-03-2024
Court
LABOUR COURT, RAJKOT
Judge
2-JUDGE, LABOUR COURT
Decision Date
01st April 2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGEMENT
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
GAURIBEN MOTIBHAI
Adv. DHIRUBHAI MAKWANA
Respondent(s)
MORBI NAGAR PALIKA Advocate - G K BHATT
Hearing History
Judge: 2-JUDGE, LABOUR COURT
Disposed
For Order
For Arguement of opponent
For Arguement of opponent
For Evidence of opponent
| Date | Purpose |
|---|---|
| 01-04-2026 | Disposed |
| 11-03-2026 | For Order |
| 21-02-2026 | For Arguement of opponent |
| 16-02-2026 | For Arguement of opponent |
| 19-01-2026 | For Evidence of opponent |
Final Orders / Judgements
Summary The Labour Court at Morbi has upheld a worker's claim under the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, Section 33(2), directing the municipal corporation to pay the employee Rs. 52,000 for unprovided uniforms (dress allowance) for the period 1995-2019, plus Rs. 1,000 as case expenses. The court rejected the municipality's defense that the worker was not entitled to the benefit, finding that municipal regulations mandated providing bi-annual uniforms and warm clothing every five years, which were never supplied. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Summary The Labour Court at Morbi has upheld a worker's claim under the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, Section 33(2), directing the municipal corporation to pay the employee Rs. 52,000 for unprovided uniforms (dress allowance) for the period 1995-2019, plus Rs. 1,000 as case expenses. The court rejected the municipality's defense that the worker was not entitled to the benefit, finding that municipal regulations mandated providing bi-annual uniforms and warm clothing every five years, which were never supplied. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Browse Related Cases
Cases under same legislation
Explore other courts