KESHVAJI P PADHARIYA vs CHIEF OFFICER MORBI NAGARPALIKA Advocate - G K BHATT — 19/2022

Case under Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 Section 33C. Disposed: Contested--JUDGEMENT on 01st April 2026.

Case disposed

RECO33C2 LC - Recovery 33C (2)

CNR: GJRJ180001792022

Filing Number

19/2022

Filing Date

08-Mar-2022

Registration No

19/2022

Registration Date

08-Mar-2022

Court

LABOUR COURT, RAJKOT

Judge

2-Judge, Labour Court

Decision Date

01-Apr-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--JUDGEMENT

Last updated 16-May-2026

Acts & Sections

Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 Section 33C

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.KESHVAJI P PADHARIYA

    Adv. DHIRUBHAI MAKWANA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.CHIEF OFFICER MORBI NAGARPALIKA Advocate - G K BHATT

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 01-Apr-2026

    JudegementView PDF

    Summary The Labour Court at Morabi ordered the Morabi Municipal Corporation to pay a former employee ₹57,000 as dues for uniforms (dress allowance) from 1995 to 2021 under municipal regulations, plus ₹1,000 for application costs and 12% simple interest from judgment date if payment is delayed. The court found the employee entitled to the prescribed dress allowance per municipal rules and rejected the corporation's defense of non-employment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 01-Apr-2026

    Disposed

    Judge, Labour Court

  4. 11-Mar-2026

    For Order

    Judge, Labour Court

  5. 21-Feb-2026

    For Reply of opponent

    Judge, Labour Court

  6. 19-Feb-2026

    For Arguement of opponent

    Judge, Labour Court

  7. 04-Feb-2026

    For Arguement of opponent

    Judge, Labour Court

  8. 07-Jan-2026

    For Arguement of opponent

    Judge, Labour Court

  9. 10-Dec-2025

    For Arguement of opponent

  10. 19-Nov-2025

    For Arguement of opponent

    Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

  11. 08-Oct-2025

    For Arguement of opponent

    Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

  12. 17-Sep-2025

    For Arguement of opponent

    Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

  13. 20-Aug-2025

    For Arguement of opponent

    Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

  14. 23-Jul-2025

    For Arguement of Applicant

    Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

  15. 18-Jun-2025

    For Evidence of opponent

    Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

  16. 21-May-2025

    For Evidence of opponent

    Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

  17. 19-Mar-2025

    For Evidence of opponent

    Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

  18. 19-Feb-2025

    For Evidence of Applicant

    Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

  19. 21-Dec-2024

    For Evidence of Applicant

    Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

  20. 25-Oct-2024

    For Evidence of Applicant

    Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

  21. 21-Sep-2024

    For Evidence of Applicant

    Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

  22. 15-Jul-2024

    For Evidence of Applicant

    Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

  23. 20-May-2024

    For Evidence of Applicant

    Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

  24. 18-Mar-2024

    For Evidence of Applicant

    Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

  25. 15-Jan-2024

    For Evidence of Applicant

    Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

  26. 20-Nov-2023

    For Evidence of Applicant

    Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

  27. 18-Sep-2023

    For Reply of opponent

    Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

  28. 21-Aug-2023

    For Reply of opponent

    Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

  29. 17-Jul-2023

    For Reply of opponent

    Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

  30. 17-Apr-2023

    For Reply of opponent

    Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

  31. 16-Jan-2023

    For Reply of opponent

    Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

  32. 17-Oct-2022

    For Reply of opponent

    Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

  33. 20-Jun-2022

    For Reply of opponent

    Judge, Labour Court (Jd)

  34. 22-Apr-2022

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  35. 08-Mar-2022

    Case filed

    Registration No. 19/2022

casestatus.in Summary

Summary The Labour Court at Morabi ordered the Morabi Municipal Corporation to pay a former employee ₹57,000 as dues for uniforms (dress allowance) from 1995 to 2021 under municipal regulations, plus ₹1,000 for application costs and 12% simple interest from judgment date if payment is delayed. The court found the employee entitled to the prescribed dress allowance per municipal rules and rejected the corporation's defense of non-employment. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

High Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case