Government of Gujarat vs DINESHBHAI VIRAJIBHAI JAKHANIYA Advocate - A R BAMBHAVA — 620/2025
Case under Gujarat (Bombay) Prohibition Act, 1949 Section 65(a)(a),65(b),65(c),65(d),65(f). Disposed: Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL on 24th April 2026.
CC - CRIMINAL CASE
CNR: GJRJ100007632025
e-Filing Number
08-10-2025
Filing Number
620/2025
Filing Date
03-Dec-2025
Registration No
620/2025
Registration Date
03-Dec-2025
Court
TALUKA COURT, PADDHARI
Judge
1-Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
Decision Date
24-Apr-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--JUDGMENT BY ACQUITTAL
Last updated 16-May-2026
FIR Details
FIR Number
11213042250457
Police Station
PADDHARI POLICE STATION - RAJKOT DISTRICT
Year
2025
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.Government of Gujarat
Adv. APP
Respondent(s)
-
1.DINESHBHAI VIRAJIBHAI JAKHANIYA Advocate - A R BAMBHAVA
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
24-Apr-2026
JudegementView PDF
The court acquitted the accused Dineshbhai Virjibhai Jakhanyia of charges under the Prohibition Act Section 65(a)(a)(b)(c)(d)(f), finding that the prosecution failed to prove its case beyond reasonable doubt. The court emphasized that the prosecution relied solely on police witnesses without independent corroboration and lacked credible evidence of the accused's direct possession of illicit liquor, applying established criminal law principles requiring strong corroboration in such cases. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
24-Apr-2026
Disposed
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
13-Mar-2026
Judgement
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
11-Mar-2026
Final Arguments
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
20-Feb-2026
Further Statement
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
30-Jan-2026
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
08-Jan-2026
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
12-Dec-2025
Evidence Of Prosecution
Principal CIVIL Judge & J.M.F.C
-
03-Dec-2025
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
03-Dec-2025
Case filed
Registration No. 620/2025
The court acquitted the accused Dineshbhai Virjibhai Jakhanyia of charges under the Prohibition Act Section 65(a)(a)(b)(c)(d)(f), finding that the prosecution failed to prove its case beyond reasonable doubt. The court emphasized that the prosecution relied solely on police witnesses without independent corroboration and lacked credible evidence of the accused's direct possession of illicit liquor, applying established criminal law principles requiring strong corroboration in such cases. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts